***HU SNG REGS THREAD***
12-23-2011
, 07:16 AM
The only good solution i found was to temporarily make the normal click a right click and then dragging worked, I moved the HUD to a nice place, then restored normal clicking and haven't moved HUD since.
12-23-2011
, 01:32 PM
greatest use of ITRIED2WARNU's avatar towards the end of this video 
http://gizmodo.com/5870282/this-guy-...internet-memes
http://gizmodo.com/5870282/this-guy-...internet-memes
12-23-2011
, 04:15 PM
12-23-2011
, 04:35 PM
Quote:
I just scanned my program with fresh download of Spybot(that according to you picked it up as huge threat) and here are the results
Now lets examine what you said. I will mainly focus on statements/accusations.
then afterwards
And what is funniest of all after all of it you wrote, on the end you just add that maybe its all coincidence.
So let me ask you dear sir, are you even mildly aware what can this accusations bring(from forum admins banning me to people hunting me asking questions to my friends or even partners thinking i might be infecting them with viruses) ?
Will you stop for a second please, and ask yourself what could have you just do by writting all of this with special remark on the end - maybe its all coincidence
Good God...
Now lets examine what you said. I will mainly focus on statements/accusations.
then afterwards
And what is funniest of all after all of it you wrote, on the end you just add that maybe its all coincidence.
So let me ask you dear sir, are you even mildly aware what can this accusations bring(from forum admins banning me to people hunting me asking questions to my friends or even partners thinking i might be infecting them with viruses) ?
Will you stop for a second please, and ask yourself what could have you just do by writting all of this with special remark on the end - maybe its all coincidence
Good God...
I think you misunderstand
There was a Spybot warning while the exe program was unpacking this was not co-incidence it deleted the exe program.
I found 2 key logger type trojans on my PC subsequent to this. I found another after my previous post.
Draw your own conclusion. I just pointed out that it may not have been your program that put them there and that Spybot can show false positives.
I really don't think you you should be bagging me for reporting accurately what happened and as a result of this I spent several hours running security stuff on my PC.
Obviously I am aware of what I was saying and I was not accusing you of anything. I was accurately reporting what happened. And you have the opportunity to respond.
My decision to alert the community was becasue I thought the potential harm from a trojan or keylogger was greater than the impact on one individual who has the opportunity to respond.
Question for Moderator
Question for mods, if you have a problem like this with something you download from one of the forums should you alert the community?
12-23-2011
, 06:40 PM
12-23-2011
, 07:52 PM
ok i want to shed some light on this software,
to start with im not overreacting to something someone said also im at uni studying computer science so im not a computer n00b :P
so first i went to get the program and multiple times i got this error thrown at me by ESET
so after getting this 4-5 time i killed the install and decided to so some digging.
it turns out that this is most likely a false-posiitive given to me by the threat sense engine. The main reson it would throw errors is due to with the scripting language used, that language is autoit!
Its designed to be an out of the box language that will let you manipulate the windows GUI (similar to AHK) how ever it doesn't require any run time libraries! This can cause security problems as it makes the program hard to kill and fight especially if it can replicate itself (a good way to kill high level language programs is to kill the libraries it needs to run) So most likly all security software is telling not to run it as it could manipulate what your seeing etc and cause alot of problems and it would be hard to stop.
It would be nice to have the developer come in and say if the program is designed in this language and if not why ESET is coming to that conclusion.
Cliffs
----------
1) probably not spyware
2) false positives are most likely to be thrown
3) possible programmed in autoit language
4) waiting on developer to replay to pass verdict
as an aside, though i like the idea i think like chadders0 it most likely is against stars T/S as you can "hunt people"
to start with im not overreacting to something someone said also im at uni studying computer science so im not a computer n00b :P
so first i went to get the program and multiple times i got this error thrown at me by ESET
so after getting this 4-5 time i killed the install and decided to so some digging.
it turns out that this is most likely a false-posiitive given to me by the threat sense engine. The main reson it would throw errors is due to with the scripting language used, that language is autoit!
Its designed to be an out of the box language that will let you manipulate the windows GUI (similar to AHK) how ever it doesn't require any run time libraries! This can cause security problems as it makes the program hard to kill and fight especially if it can replicate itself (a good way to kill high level language programs is to kill the libraries it needs to run) So most likly all security software is telling not to run it as it could manipulate what your seeing etc and cause alot of problems and it would be hard to stop.
It would be nice to have the developer come in and say if the program is designed in this language and if not why ESET is coming to that conclusion.
Cliffs
----------
1) probably not spyware
2) false positives are most likely to be thrown
3) possible programmed in autoit language
4) waiting on developer to replay to pass verdict
as an aside, though i like the idea i think like chadders0 it most likely is against stars T/S as you can "hunt people"
12-23-2011
, 08:04 PM
Ah the worlds of software and husng get mixed up 
nice post betmagic, yeah msim is very likely to have made this with autoit., I believe that's his language of choice
fwiw ahk can compile to exe too with no dependencies, and when done so gets a similar large amount of false positives from av suites from time to time, it's the way they're paced / run - and it doesn't help they nearly always want to install "keyloggers" (how are you gonna turn keypresses into hotkey events without intercepting the keyboard?)
As to the value of the software itself, I can't really comment. I think >$500 is insane personally, but then I don't play $1k husngs! auto-sitting open lobbies is imo obviously not scalable past a few regs at each stake.
About a month I wrote a ~10 line ahk that makes a beep when the lobby goes empty, so I can read 2+2 while waiting to opensit. I might make it beep differently is a green player opensits, maybe... It's a bit clunky though, obv. not nearly as polished as this tool looks. That with my already posted single-click register script is enough for me for now
nice post betmagic, yeah msim is very likely to have made this with autoit., I believe that's his language of choice
fwiw ahk can compile to exe too with no dependencies, and when done so gets a similar large amount of false positives from av suites from time to time, it's the way they're paced / run - and it doesn't help they nearly always want to install "keyloggers" (how are you gonna turn keypresses into hotkey events without intercepting the keyboard?)
As to the value of the software itself, I can't really comment. I think >$500 is insane personally, but then I don't play $1k husngs! auto-sitting open lobbies is imo obviously not scalable past a few regs at each stake.
About a month I wrote a ~10 line ahk that makes a beep when the lobby goes empty, so I can read 2+2 while waiting to opensit. I might make it beep differently is a green player opensits, maybe... It's a bit clunky though, obv. not nearly as polished as this tool looks. That with my already posted single-click register script is enough for me for now
12-23-2011
, 08:38 PM
12-23-2011
, 08:46 PM