September 9th MTT grind rail
09-09-2010
, 08:44 AM
09-09-2010
, 08:50 AM
09-09-2010
, 09:25 AM
Out $100 mtt 
PokerStars Game #49359299880: Tournament #329010294, $100+$9 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level II (15/30) - 2010/09/09 15:24:47 CET [2010/09/09 9:24:47 ET]
Table '329010294 15' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: freekie112 (2520 in chips)
Seat 2: digit135 (2655 in chips)
Seat 3: PitaMM (3000 in chips)
Seat 4: mighty-blosh (6659 in chips)
Seat 6: Eirik227 (2823 in chips)
Seat 7: miel23 (4830 in chips)
Seat 8: Romeplayer (1960 in chips)
Seat 9: nowherebutup (3763 in chips)
miel23: posts small blind 15
Romeplayer: posts big blind 30
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Eirik227 [Kd Ks]
nowherebutup: raises 60 to 90
freekie112: calls 90
digit135: folds
PitaMM: folds
mighty-blosh: raises 150 to 240
Romeplayer is disconnected
Romeplayer is connected
Eirik227: raises 2583 to 2823 and is all-in
miel23: folds
Romeplayer: folds
nowherebutup: folds
freekie112: folds
mighty-blosh: calls 2583
*** FLOP *** [Jd 4s 2h]
*** TURN *** [Jd 4s 2h] [Ad]
*** RIVER *** [Jd 4s 2h Ad] [2d]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
mighty-blosh: shows [Ac Kc] (two pair, Aces and Deuces)
Eirik227: shows [Kd Ks] (two pair, Kings and Deuces)
mighty-blosh collected 5871 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 5871 | Rake 0
Board [Jd 4s 2h Ad 2d]
Seat 1: freekie112 folded before Flop
Seat 2: digit135 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: PitaMM folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: mighty-blosh showed [Ac Kc] and won (5871) with two pair, Aces and Deuces
Seat 6: Eirik227 (button) showed [Kd Ks] and lost with two pair, Kings and Deuces
Seat 7: miel23 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 8: Romeplayer (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: nowherebutup folded before Flop
PokerStars Game #49359299880: Tournament #329010294, $100+$9 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level II (15/30) - 2010/09/09 15:24:47 CET [2010/09/09 9:24:47 ET]
Table '329010294 15' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: freekie112 (2520 in chips)
Seat 2: digit135 (2655 in chips)
Seat 3: PitaMM (3000 in chips)
Seat 4: mighty-blosh (6659 in chips)
Seat 6: Eirik227 (2823 in chips)
Seat 7: miel23 (4830 in chips)
Seat 8: Romeplayer (1960 in chips)
Seat 9: nowherebutup (3763 in chips)
miel23: posts small blind 15
Romeplayer: posts big blind 30
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to Eirik227 [Kd Ks]
nowherebutup: raises 60 to 90
freekie112: calls 90
digit135: folds
PitaMM: folds
mighty-blosh: raises 150 to 240
Romeplayer is disconnected
Romeplayer is connected
Eirik227: raises 2583 to 2823 and is all-in
miel23: folds
Romeplayer: folds
nowherebutup: folds
freekie112: folds
mighty-blosh: calls 2583
*** FLOP *** [Jd 4s 2h]
*** TURN *** [Jd 4s 2h] [Ad]
*** RIVER *** [Jd 4s 2h Ad] [2d]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
mighty-blosh: shows [Ac Kc] (two pair, Aces and Deuces)
Eirik227: shows [Kd Ks] (two pair, Kings and Deuces)
mighty-blosh collected 5871 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 5871 | Rake 0
Board [Jd 4s 2h Ad 2d]
Seat 1: freekie112 folded before Flop
Seat 2: digit135 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: PitaMM folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: mighty-blosh showed [Ac Kc] and won (5871) with two pair, Aces and Deuces
Seat 6: Eirik227 (button) showed [Kd Ks] and lost with two pair, Kings and Deuces
Seat 7: miel23 (small blind) folded before Flop
Seat 8: Romeplayer (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 9: nowherebutup folded before Flop
09-09-2010
, 01:40 PM
I really don't think it was the right thing to do, by playing the other tournaments... And since u live in GMT (wherever that is 
Most of your investors are US based, so you are correct 5 am most of us are sleeping.. So, imo just not wise..
Plus, the tourneys you replaced had a $109 and $75 which are way harder than the proposed original tournaments...
Just my opinion..
Note:
What's done is done.... Im not upset or angry with your decision.. I understand you want to play.. Next time, I would just try and add similar tourneys.. Because investors are looking for +ev spots not adding tougher more neutral or - ev ones..
GL in whatever else u have left
Most of your investors are US based, so you are correct 5 am most of us are sleeping.. So, imo just not wise..Plus, the tourneys you replaced had a $109 and $75 which are way harder than the proposed original tournaments...
Just my opinion..
Note:
What's done is done.... Im not upset or angry with your decision.. I understand you want to play.. Next time, I would just try and add similar tourneys.. Because investors are looking for +ev spots not adding tougher more neutral or - ev ones..
GL in whatever else u have left
09-09-2010
, 01:49 PM
Quote:
I really don't think it was the right thing to do, by playing the other tournaments... And since u live in GMT (wherever that is Most of your investors are US based, so you are correct 5 am most of us are sleeping.. So, imo just not wise..
Plus, the tourneys you replaced had a $109 and $75 which are way harder than the proposed original tournaments...
Just my opinion..
Note:
What's done is done.... Im not upset or angry with your decision.. I understand you want to play.. Next time, I would just try and add similar tourneys.. Because investors are looking for +ev spots not adding tougher more neutral or - ev ones..
GL in whatever else u have left
Most of your investors are US based, so you are correct 5 am most of us are sleeping.. So, imo just not wise..Plus, the tourneys you replaced had a $109 and $75 which are way harder than the proposed original tournaments...
Just my opinion..
Note:
What's done is done.... Im not upset or angry with your decision.. I understand you want to play.. Next time, I would just try and add similar tourneys.. Because investors are looking for +ev spots not adding tougher more neutral or - ev ones..
GL in whatever else u have left
not a huge deal, but good to do in the future
nice job in the plo
09-09-2010
, 01:53 PM
09-09-2010
, 02:03 PM
Quote:
I really don't think it was the right thing to do, by playing the other tournaments... And since u live in GMT (wherever that is Most of your investors are US based, so you are correct 5 am most of us are sleeping.. So, imo just not wise..
Plus, the tourneys you replaced had a $109 and $75 which are way harder than the proposed original tournaments...
Just my opinion..
Note:
What's done is done.... Im not upset or angry with your decision.. I understand you want to play.. Next time, I would just try and add similar tourneys.. Because investors are looking for +ev spots not adding tougher more neutral or - ev ones..
GL in whatever else u have left
Most of your investors are US based, so you are correct 5 am most of us are sleeping.. So, imo just not wise..Plus, the tourneys you replaced had a $109 and $75 which are way harder than the proposed original tournaments...
Just my opinion..
Note:
What's done is done.... Im not upset or angry with your decision.. I understand you want to play.. Next time, I would just try and add similar tourneys.. Because investors are looking for +ev spots not adding tougher more neutral or - ev ones..
GL in whatever else u have left
The $75 turbo and the $55 turbo will have about the same opponents, maybe a little bit tougher, and I really don`t think Im -EV in the $109 at 3pm either. I have a couple of deep $109 runs, although a small sample size, and a $109 at 3pm GMT+1 is not the same as a reg-infested $109 that runs later in the day. Also I put $35 of my own money covering the difference.
I am truly sorry for oversleeping, but I don`t think it altered the EV of the package that much, and I did what I thought was in the investors best interest at that time.