then I do it on my own - Page 5 - Poker Blogs and Goals -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

don't think you can really blame people for not believing it'd happened.

on the internet + poker these days = be suspicious of everything

i agree it didn't really seem right, but congrats man. really sick to make that much so quickly. Gl and hope you keep moving up

It's totally beleivable, look at me... I put 25$ on and a week later I had 1200$ and was a platinumstar.

Quote

06-03-2012 , 02:01 AM

#103

phenomenal

old hand

Join Date: Oct 2009 Posts: 1,524

Quote:

Originally Posted by JasonOnStars

@Phenom. You still miss the point of playing c/c in resteal pots I don't really know what to comment on your analysis. I stated my opinion you stated yours. I think mine is better but that's poker.

No problem

. It just boils down to the fact that you think villain bets 2x when checked to and I think 1x. Because of this I am in love in check raising now

. If I decide to go for a funky line it will be CR. Hope to induce some madness vs player that stabs just once with air. If he calls I cr again flush completing turns and shove everything else. But mostly I will be just value betting in 3bet pot with AQ on AK5ss.

Quote

06-03-2012 , 02:54 AM

#104

Sol Eisenberg

banned

Join Date: May 2012 Posts: 113

why do you post in msnl ? your a micro donklol

Quote

06-03-2012 , 03:03 AM

#105

As1an1nvas1on

Pooh-Bah

Join Date: Jul 2010 Posts: 4,352

Quote:

Originally Posted by JasonOnStars

PM I sent to ponty

Okay let me just clear a few things up shortly:

- I never lied about anything in this blog
- I understand things got a bit missy since I didn't update anything from 24-27 at that point I was already playing NL200 and started taking shots on NL400 (and at that point the challenge was already done graphwise becaus I obv had 2k more graphwise than on my roll)
- I mean you could just check the stakingguy why would I not go on playing nl50/100 staked (100% profit for me and only RB to them) if I didn't have roll to play on stars.

Whatsoever I'll try to give a decent update about 24-30th.

24/05. I don't know my actual graphstate at the end of the day. even tho I dropped a bit I think it was close to 6k already caus I won a bunch of $ nl200zoom couldve been less couldve been more i dno i dnt care

25/05. cant even remember that day I think I played alot of HU though and also played my first nl200 HU session I think. don't know how much I was up but I assume it was a bunch of $

26/05 eventually shotted 400 zoom went up like 2.5k on that day again couldve been more couldve been less( challenge was done already graphwise at that point)

27/05 had my biggest losing session on nl600/400/200 zoom and dropped like 1.7k grinded it back anyways and when I made that update I think it was like 3 AM in germany ( so the 28th already) and I just won a few stack NL200 HU => had 26k FPPS and bought the 300$ stellar and my roll was somewhere at 6.8k euros)

So basically the challenge was done on 26th already.

@Khal. It's funny isn't it? I give a handanalysis and a bunch of NL1k regs state the complete opposite and even get fairly out of line. And then suddenly a wild Sauce123 appears and actually approves my analysis (same for Internet in PMchat and MtW-Davin in skype). Perfect example for what 2+2 has come to. 98% of the so called NL1k regs are actually complete dog****. i mean lmao I remember girah posting hands here and got flamed so hard even after making huge and correct analysis.

I was srs about the hu4rolls. but scumregs are scumregs

@Phenom. You still miss the point of playing c/c in resteal pots I don't really know what to comment on your analysis. I stated my opinion you stated yours. I think mine is better but that's poker.

There is no such thing as 400 or 600zoom. Liar. Lolololololololol

Last edited by As1an1nvas1on; 06-03-2012 at 03:10 AM.