Quote:
Originally Posted by Calm Down
After admitting on youtube that you're not very good, why do you insist on arguing for your lines all the time? Seems like you know you're not very good but refuse to take any advice. I glanced at the hands in this page and almost all were misplayed, you seem to bluff bad combos and give up/not vbet hands that you should.
which combos were bad? I only post the most interesting hands and now the worst hands of the day, so you guys will always see hands that make me look bad. Also when it comes to valuebetting, I valuebet insanely thin, to the point that I will get owned if villains start folding the hands they should. I just don't feel like posting them, not very interesting when I go with TPWK for 3 streets or overbet turn jam river with an overpair.
And I take the advice that looks good, if I start taking mirage's advice I will get nowhere, he advocates to never bluff, that bluffing is always spew. That's why the worst bluffs come from nits, because they aren't used to bluffing, so they just bluff while tilting.
I just can't take all advice and follow everyone's guidance, because those advices will conflict with each other and I have a limited amount of hands I can play. Gotta select the nest ones and discuss why the bad ones are bad(because it helps to learn when you prove a play is wrong).
As I said: "what hands do you get ott with if you're villain in the hand I folded a set?". Everyone said it was a bad fold, but nobody answered that question yet. How am I supposed to listen to people's advice if they don't use logic to back their arguments?
I see great value in discussing strat here, this thread is basically one of the few places where people are discussing strat in this forum, and it helped me to improve my game a lot. All advice/discussion on strat is welcomed here, but your goal while posting shouldn't be to force me to accept that you're right, but to increase your,mine and everyone that's reading knowledge of the gane.