Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapidesh123
it's suboptimal, but it's not as bad as you think. .
suboptimal? Its literally the dumbest thing ever posted on this forum. Its literally hard to comprehend how anyone could be that ******ed.
H1. lol at trying to get Qx to fold there. Give up on that river.
H3. Vs that turn sizing jam the turn and take him to the dog pound. Scared money as usual flatting that garbage sizing on turn when your committed and should be never thinking about folding.
H4. Flat pre.
H6. fold pre. your 3betting too wide sb vs bu. Stop trying to be otb. As played your in an awful spot, and got lucky as usual.
H7 give up turn.
The only hand you played well was AA which played itself.
Verdict. 1/7.
Amazingly you never seem to get better.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rapidesh123
If you use the right filters,you can isolate some spots and get a better understanding of how a fish plays his hands. And I have info on every hand the fish played, even ones that didnt go to showdown, because I was the fish in those hands.
We usually think we own fish a lot, but we have a very low sample on average on most fish. Thats why Ive seen a lot of people take different lines vs them(most +ev ofc). People often build their strat vs fish from a biased point of view that is based heavily on the player's experience in the pots he played vs fish in his life.
Being +ev is different than owning a fish's soul for the max winrate possible. And I dont have a better idea than looking at the first hands Ive played in poker in order to do that
What the fk are you talking about? You have played hundreds of thousands of hands on 16z-200z yet you think the only good samples you have on fish are 25c sngs and play money?