Quote:
Originally Posted by FellaGaga-52
As to the mental game, what do you think of the idea that some players and writers who seem to have little appreciation of the significance of the mental game, lack insight on this because of their extremely rigid, mathematical, and unemotional approach to the game. So when they sit, most all of the emotional factors that tilt many millions of players are already ironed out of their game via this approach, thus making them blind to the subject.
That's a complex topic and I'm not sure I understand what you're saying or asking.
Some players who lack that insight also just don't really need it, right? (due to their strategy and personality being sufficiently machine-like)
And they don't need to iron those emotional factors out of their game, as those factors simply don't arise to a sufficient extent.
But regardless of why: If they do lack that domain of insight, then they must be flawed as coaches, mentors etc., I suppose.