After so much work finally some really good results! Happy to see that*
Inviato dal mio SM-A310F utilizzando Tapatalk
Quote:
Originally Posted by dev123
Graphs looking good.
That yearly one, you are up about 30 BIs then at 25NL in ~35k hands meaning you are running around 8bb/100 or something?
Well played if so.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenaBadBeat
Graph is looking tasty mate, strong! Keep it up
Cheers guys. Made some adjustments but as usual it's difficult to tell how much they are responsible for the results and how much may just be a bit of running hot.
Preflop: Hero is MP with K, A 1 fold, Hero raises to $0.63, Button raises to $3.50, 2 folds, Hero raises to $29.43 (All-In), Button calls $23.80 (All-In)
Flop: ($54.95) 6, 4, 3 (2 players, 2 all-in)
Turn: ($54.95) 2 (2 players, 2 all-in)
River: ($54.95) Q (2 players, 2 all-in)
Total pot: $54.95 | Rake: $2
Spoiler:
Button had 9, 6 (one pair, sixes).
Hero had K, A (high card, Ace).
Outcome: Button won $52.95
Things still appear to be going well. My volume is still lower than usual but I'm doing a bit of work off the tables so that's responsible for some of it.
With regards to my results so far I think 4 things are responsible for them (in no particular order)
1) Some rungood
2) I adjusted my preflop ranges based on last years results
3) I've made some changes postflop, that I'm still working on
4) I'm using TST for seating rather than doing things manually so I'm probably sitting on tables that are slightly less reg heavy than usual
It's impossible to tell how much each element is responsible for my improved winrate and my mind wants to downplay number 1 even though there's a chance it could be entirely responsible, although I hope not as that would mean I'm probably gonna have a helluva downswing at some point.
I'm having to fight the urge to work on too many things at once at the moment but I've mainly been concentrating on playing in position as the preflop raiser and I'm trying to get a really good understanding of that before moving on. One other thing I have started trying out from yesterday is including a limping range in the SB. I've always been of the understanding that it's not really a viable option in the micros due to the rake but having had a look at a few things I think I may be able to make it work. Time will tell though.
I'll post an updated graph in a few days when I have a few more hands as I've only got 5000 so far for the month.
For anyone reading this who uses PIO etc, I need to ask a favour. I'm looking at modelling resteal plays as I still believe my play in 3bet pots, especially OOP is a big weakness in my game. What bet sizings should I include in my sims and should I vary it based on flop types? Flop especially I'm torn between using only a 50% cbet sizing or sometimes using a 33% sizing, depending on the texture. Using a mixture of both and allowing the software to choose just complicates things. Happy for a PM if you don't want to post on here.
For anyone reading this who uses PIO etc, I need to ask a favour. I'm looking at modelling resteal plays as I still believe my play in 3bet pots, especially OOP is a big weakness in my game. What bet sizings should I include in my sims and should I vary it based on flop types? Flop especially I'm torn between using only a 50% cbet sizing or sometimes using a 33% sizing, depending on the texture. Using a mixture of both and allowing the software to choose just complicates things. Happy for a PM if you don't want to post on here.
If you give Pio multiple bet sizings it tends to just divide its bets between them rather than picking one sizing over the other. Id say give Pio one sizing for each street and try to learn how it plays its ranges. You could always run the same sim twice to see how it differs to bet 33% each street vs 50%. Then when you are at the tables figure out what bet sizing strategy seems most appropriate for the current spot considering your range, the board and the villain.
If you give Pio multiple bet sizings it tends to just divide its bets between them rather than picking one sizing over the other. Id say give Pio one sizing for each street and try to learn how it plays its ranges. You could always run the same sim twice to see how it differs to bet 33% each street vs 50%. Then when you are at the tables figure out what bet sizing strategy seems most appropriate for the current spot considering your range, the board and the villain.
If you give Pio multiple bet sizings it tends to just divide its bets between them rather than picking one sizing over the other. Id say give Pio one sizing for each street and try to learn how it plays its ranges. You could always run the same sim twice to see how it differs to bet 33% each street vs 50%. Then when you are at the tables figure out what bet sizing strategy seems most appropriate for the current spot considering your range, the board and the villain.
I'd initially given it the option of a couple of sizings but as you say it just complicates things by betting the various sizings a certain percentage of times. I've actually run different board types with specific sizings and when I feel a bit less hungover I'll get round to trying to analyse them to see if the EV of certain sizings are higher EV.
All these years of playing poker and I've never really felt all that confident playing resteal pots oops.
I'd initially given it the option of a couple of sizings but as you say it just complicates things by betting the various sizings a certain percentage of times. I've actually run different board types with specific sizings and when I feel a bit less hungover I'll get round to trying to analyse them to see if the EV of certain sizings are higher EV.
All these years of playing poker and I've never really felt all that confident playing resteal pots oops.
If you give it say two sizings, 33 and 55%, find out which one it prefers in a spot and then figure out why. Apply a simplified strategy of just using one sizing (the one it prefers). You can actually re-solve using one sizing (i.e. the one it suggests) and quite often the EV of the simplified strategy is very close to the Strat with multiple sizings.
Knowing how to simplify Pio strats effectively is really valuable imo.
If you give it say two sizings, 33 and 55%, find out which one it prefers in a spot and then figure out why. Apply a simplified strategy of just using one sizing (the one it prefers). You can actually re-solve using one sizing (i.e. the one it suggests) and quite often the EV of the simplified strategy is very close to the Strat with multiple sizings.
Knowing how to simplify Pio strats effectively is really valuable imo.
When I looked at sizings in another spot I was actually quite surprised to find that changing sizings didn't actually make much, if any, difference to the EV.