Quote:
Originally Posted by DifferentName
Your main mode of playing needs to be online. The massive increase in volume more than makes up for the tougher games. 600 hands/hour at 4bb/100 at 200nl makes you almost 5x the money than 30 hands/hour at 10bb/100 at 1/3 ($48/hr for the former and ~$10/hr for the latter assuming 100 hands/hour online, 6 tabling). And that's before the time it takes to get to the room, waiting on lists, etc.
Good live win-rates are more in the 30-40BB/100 range. The worst player at the average 200NL table would probably be the best player at the average 1|3 live table. Approximately 8/9 players at a 1|3 live table have no clue about beginner's level poker concepts like position and hand selection.
Also, if you want to maintain the same level of risk, you'd need a bigger roll at 200NL winning 4BB/100 than you would at 1|3 winning 10BB/100. Equivalent risk would be 120NL if we assume the same 4BB/100 win-rate.
We also can't just assume OP would be winning 4BB/100 online, or even winning at all. He should stick to what he knows until he can prove he can beat online games for a worthwhile rate.
Your money is also less liquid online, which is usually not a big deal if you plan properly but can be annoying sometimes.