July update:
Both are kinda wrong in terms of $won since it should be $550 (without rakeback) but I go with the pokertracker one since its the lowest for now.
1.5 EV BB/100
3.96 BB/100
Table Profits:
$399.93
Rakeback: $225
Total:
$624
GG
Pokertracker
In terms of study I tell you what I normally do. Usually I will look at what my current dataset is (20k hands) and compare it against my previous hands e.g. 500k I will compare these strategies to see how much deviation or above below I am from the long term average.
$/hand is dividing by the total number of hands so in this example its 500k for my overall sample and 20k for my current data sample
Strategy name - How much I should make $/hand - What I am making with my current data set - Red means I'm below my expectation and green means I'm above.
SRP (without calling 3bets) $0.038
$0.036
SRP (with 4bets+) $0.049
$0.065
3bets (without calling 4bets) $0.027
$0.023
3bets (call 4bet+) $0.029
$0.023
cold caller $0.006
$0.003
call 3bets $(0.000)
$0.006
call 4bets $(0.002)
$(0.006)
4bet with bluffs -$0.13
$3.80
4bet with value (99+,AK) $5.34
$7.89
Went all in (big posts 90bb+) $0.003
$0.019
-
So what do I infer here, I have lost more than expected in SRP without calling 3bets but maybe this is due to run outs... including 4bets+ I am way more profitable which conclude the population is overbluffing or overdefending against me in these spots.
Cold caller I am losing more than my expectation but I think in general the games are getting more aggressive
Call 3bets I am winning more but that again is due to I think people are too aggressive and overbluffing too much in 3bet pots
Call 4bets take time to converge so I wont infer anything here
the 4bet stats also reaffirm what I said above people are too aggressive and overdefending or overbluffing hence my profits with bluffs and value are more than expected.
Went all in is most likely the same thing I said.
In general the population has adjusted to become more spewy in 3betting, overbluffing in 3bet pots and overdefending e.g. bluff catching in spots where I usually have value and no bluffs and thats is where my profit is coming from.
-
Last stat is actually number of times i got dealt a premium and how much I make on average e.g. $/hand dealt a premium (JJ+,AK)
Premium hands $2.08
$2.80
So this number also reconfirms everything I said about general population in general I am making about 50% more profits than I should have and that is due to population are bluffing or barreling too much in 3bet scenarios.
Anyway I hope that helps you to understand how I analyze my game.
When I see strong deviation or run bads e.g. say my allins are below expectation or I'm losing in key areas I should be winning e.g. SRP, 3bettor or 4betting I will dive into the numbers and see if its a matter of bad luck e.g. my bluffs get jammed on too frequently or I am bluff catching or defending too much in spots I should be folding... Usually if I deviate from solid play I always use my overall stats as my benchmark to get my game back in shape and this leads me to overall long term consistency in winning in a tough field.
I don't really do too much with solvers and haven't really been using them since Feb now... Now and then if I want to see what a solver solution is in a post I will look it up but in general I base and adjust my play on:
1. how the general population usual plays in spots.
2. If I spot any deviation why? What is the reason e.g. the reg is a losing player, clown, overbluffs, recreational player? And what further information can I conclude to base my decision e.g. timing tells, bet sizing on each street, positions and history with that opponent.