Thank you for your insight, gentlemen
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickroll
got it
it makes sense that line shopping is prudent if one were to bet professionally. high volume + high % of roll etc
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickroll
yes that vfl calculator will work, you can also make your own in excel which is what i've done and happy to email it to you if you pm me, it's a pretty simple formula
yeah that's close enough to eyeball and among friends whatever
but true vfl there would be -138/+138
so if you bet 100 the chiefs side would get 100 with a win and the other side 138
Right, makes sense.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickroll
if you're doing vig free then theoretically it should be an ev neutral bet
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickroll
sports betting is tough, i have built predictive models that do quite well in dfs but it's the kind of stuff that gets ridiculed and laughed at by sports bettors - sports betting is a lot more scalable and the parties who are setting and moving the lines are phd'd statisticians
my goal is to one day have models competent enough to to possibly make +ev sports wagers, but it'll be a long and exhaustive journey to get there
the sports betting forum here is pretty dead these days but you can still browse it for gems, there's a bunch of good wells that are great resources, you'd probably best start at the crockpot well (james holzhauer of jeopardy fame)
i have fun with it, but only do it for vig free and as part of a process of learning - i'm not wagering anywhere but that thread here
Yeah, I’m assuming it’s analogous to beating the market in investing.
I figure the issue is more so the opportunity cost of the time + energy + add. resources (like $) invested not making the pursuit worthwhile than actually gaining an edge but it’s much of the same I suppose! Mostly clueless.
My intuition does tell me that existing professional gamblers have an edge diversifying across different spheres as they can take the emotion + ego out of it and have the requisite patience + discipline.
The part about models/algos makes sense. Definitely makes sense to me to let AI do the heavy lifting if one wanted to maximize edge while minimizing opportunity cost.
Quote:
Originally Posted by rickroll
my goal is to one day have models competent enough to to possibly make +ev sports wagers, but it'll be a long and exhaustive journey to get there
i have fun with it, but only do it for vig free and as part of a process of learning - i'm not wagering anywhere but that thread here
You got this! I’ll have tons of questions so maybe we can learn together. I usually like to take the thread through what’s on my mind which is why I keep it in here as opposed to pms.
90%+ poker.
But sometimes it’s chess, sometimes it’s football, sometimes it’s womens tennis lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by wj294
Pinnacle are the only book in the west that consistently take and don't limit sharp action so their lines are more accurate on account of that. Without sharp bets it's difficult to know how strong a line is. As a result, Pinny closing lines are considered to often be the most accurate representation of the true probabilities for that event.
Got it, makes a lot of sense!
I figure one way to identify sharp action is by seeing what direction the line moves? So if like 80% of the action is on a team (dumb money like me) and the line goes in the other direction (20%) for whatever reason?
Although, my guess is that the guys willing to wager the most are going to bet as soon as the line comes out/right before it closes so maybe not too helpful.
I assume stuff this this (limiting/banning sharp action) contributes to your intense hatred of casinos, mr. sqwid?