Quote:
Originally Posted by meale
I'm sorry but saying you're "pretty sure" there are "multiple" crushers itt who have >2k hours @10bb/hr is just continuing the delusion this forum is under.
They either don't exist on this forum, or do and fabricate their results in some way but I would think that's unlikely. My suspicion is that there is just none left with that kind of WR after 2k hours because 40bb/100 in ANY game of poker is impossible.
And stop comparing online to live as apples and oranges folks. Obviously I'm aware of the differences. When it comes to winrate the only thing that actually matters is the skill differential. And I know for a fact if a $0.01/$0.02 game can only be beaten for 20bb/100 then it is not possible to beat any other game at 40bb/100 (10bb/hr as many of you are attesting to).
I am always surprised to see this opinion constantly cycled through here. I am by no means some amazing wizard and I manage a 10bb/hr playing in my local 1/2 games(1700hrs since last Sept). I personally know of at least 2 other people who are beating it similarly as well (study group) and none of us cheat on our tracking apps.
Of course no one is beating 2nl for more than 20bb/100, but at 2nl there aren't many people who can't be bothered to open a poker book. I know of dozens of live rec regs (fish) who brag openly about never reading a poker book and happily 3b shove 200bbs with AA because they 'don't want to get drawn out on'.
Quite simply, the live games have enough overall bad players that the fish never have to worry about improving. They sit and trade $$ every night and then complain about other regs pulling "donkey plays" vs them and then do the exact same move in the same session. There arent mass multitablers and HUDs taking advantage of every single mistake they make and because of the pace of game, they lose MUCH slower than they would online.