Quote:
Originally Posted by AintNoLimit
Im just questioning the statement "i think its fine" with no real reason as to why. There is a purpose for every bet and betsize. So if you will, please tell me why its fine.
Hm... Having thought about it again I agree with what your post says but then I still feel that raising $30 is acceptable. Since by raising to $30 it makes it expensive enough to isolate the hand and also make it so that the original raiser may call you with hands that you are well ahead of such as AQ, AJ, A10 etc. which seems to be the objective of this raise.
Raising more, in my opinion, would fold out some of the hands you are ahead of. True it may get hands such as the pocket 3 here to fold and not call since it doesn't have the proper odds, but then again most of the time those pocket 3s will not hit a set (7/8 times, I believe) which means he'll have to win a pot of at least $240 when villain calls for it to work out. If we can pot control it then I feel this play is viable.
Another issue I have for raising more is that I'm not too sure who would call a $50 raise in position and $40 raise OOP (since $50 x 8 makes it not profitable for set miners) unless I've got a pretty strong hand. From experience my biggest wins from AK are generally against A-Q, A-J and I'm not sure if they'd call such a raise.
Lastly if my re-raise is $30 then it makes it cheaper for me to mix up my play to include a re-raise steal.
These are my ideas, I might be terribly wrong
and would be happy to get criticized and learn more.