Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr Spyutastic
I'd say if you played close to an optimal PF strat w/ proper exploits/adjustments based on in game, you could play a super simple post flop strat and pretty much do well in the vast majority of live games.
In low-stakes games in the US this would leave lots of money on the table. Better still would be to understand an optimal preflop strategy and notice how typical players (or, better still, the individual villains in one's game) deviate, and adjust accordingly. An exploitative strategy rooted in game theory can slice off value from villains' play with a boning knife when naive exploitative play uses a machete.
Quote:
Originally Posted by feel wrath
Yep, I’ve been fighting the temptation to buy the Andrew Brokos book. He’s by far my favourite strat guy to listen to and I’m sure he’s an excellent writer, but I think the book could do more harm than good to my already fragile game
I recommend it. It is not at all solver-focused, emphasizing toy games (such as the A-K-Q game) to illuminate optimal play. Content-wise there is nothing in it that isn't also in Chen & Ankemann's
The Mathematics of Poker, but it is focused, simply explained, and to the point.