Quote:
Originally Posted by LowSociety
I was in the cbet camp until I remembered you wrote that you got caught bluffing by one of the people in the hand AND giving up by the river.
Isn't this more of a reason to bet since you'll get looked up lighter? We aren't betting as a bluff here, we're betting for value.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Zaphod888
Against more aggressive players, I'd probably bet/fold. If these V's are passive enough, then I'd just check. Bet the turn on a blank if it checks through.
I feel the exact opposite of this. Against aggressive players I'm b/c or checking to pot control since I don't want to get semi bluff check raised off my hand, against passives I'm b/f for value since they rarely bluff check raise.
Everyone advocating a check back is losing value. These villains as described combined with how they perceive hero means they are calling a cbet with a TON of hands we beat. Every combo of T/J/Q w a
is calling, plus all A
and most 9T/J9/Q9/JT. I'm not saying we're going to get 3 streets here, but not betting the flop is a leak because you let worse hands that will call a flop bet have a chance at turning a better hand for free.