Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Paying time VS Time Pots Paying time VS Time Pots

01-18-2010 , 12:36 PM
the time charge at this game is 7%/half hr.
you can pay time in two different ways:
1, pay 7$ every half
2, participate in time pots with the players who choose not to pay, this is where when the pot gets to certain amount (rake amount times the #of players in the time pot) for the first two pots of each half when the pot gets to a certain amount( when all 10players are in the time pot they take 35 for the first2 pots that get to 100)

if you play tight nitty is it best to be in time pots
and
if you are involved in more pots you should pay your time

what is the more profitable solution?
Paying time VS Time Pots Quote
01-18-2010 , 01:14 PM
Time pot introduces a rake bias toward the players most likely to win a big pot (i.e. a good aggro player).
Paying time VS Time Pots Quote
01-18-2010 , 02:22 PM
This post confuses me greatly.
Paying time VS Time Pots Quote
01-19-2010 , 01:03 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Artanis11
This post confuses me greatly.
I had no idea what timed pots were/are...
Cant we all just pay a rake?
Paying time VS Time Pots Quote
01-19-2010 , 01:36 PM
just play better then rake doesn't matter it's just a rounding error at the end of the month
Paying time VS Time Pots Quote
01-20-2010 , 05:46 PM
you shouldn't be playing timepot in NL period. you should only be playing timepot if ur playing limit.

But yes, if u are a nit, timepot would save you alot of money in the long run.
Paying time VS Time Pots Quote

      
m