Quote:
Originally Posted by ninefingershuffle
I mean, he certainly should be value betting aces up here
To get called by what? My range to get to the river this way should be combo draws (which all missed everything on the river), 88/QQ, and AK/AQ. i think AK may be a bet in his spot, AQ is not, KQ is definitely not, but AK also has a lot of showdown value and he wouldn't want to value own himself against 88 or QQ which is my most likely holdings to call a river bet unless we're chopping with AK, so I think it's pretty close for him to be betting AK or not. Normally it would seem to be a slam dunk when the river bricks, but you have to think how much it would really suck to dust off almost 400bb with two pair value owning yourself against a set (if he jams, that is)....if he has AK he has to be worried that I have 88/QQ after calling $350 on the turn
IMO, if I am in V's shoes and it was checked to me on this river, he should be betting a smaller amount ($200-400) that can get crying called by worse 2p, or betting extremely small ($100-150) to possibly induce a jam from a missed draw. Theoretically, it seems weird that my only calls here vs a jam are sets and maybe AK (which I would be more likely to call than 88, but then I'm sure he'd show up with QQ), but at the same time, what kind of TAGish 2/5 reg bluffs off $1800 in this fashion with total air? I haven't tried to do any math on frequencies of calling different sized bets, just thinking through this stuff in my head cuz obv I don't have hours to make a decision in-game.
I dunno, kind of a cool hand I think. Maybe even cooler if the river was a T/J club or heart so I could turn my hand into a weird merge/bluff where I can get called by worse sometimes but still get better hands to fold, lol. But here we are! With a lonely 3s on the river...