Quote:
Originally Posted by AngerPush
I think the payout process has been fine. If ppl have issues, we speak up and resolve them. But there needs to be a better escrow system then whoever says they'll hold it first does so. I mean this past time was just not good. It honestly made me a bit uneasy that the escrow process seemed to be behind the scenes.
Some new person can't just come in here and say "hey I have 2k, who will hold escrow" and someone pms behind scenes then says in thread they're holding it. That makes it kind of awkward.
I think there should def be a list somewhere of the vouch/escrows. It was a spreadsheet bluff created.
I agree with this. I don't like the idea of designating 3 members to hold escrows - especially if the thread grows and we gain new members.
It's safer if escrows are disbursed among more members as opposed to concentrated with 3 members. Diversification and such.
The big takeaway which comes up everytime is that when an issue arises it needs to be made public ASAP. In this instance it's clear Bluff was betting without an ability to pay up immediately. If Zeta or S87 said something sooner it could have been avoided. However I don't blame either of them - it was really on Bluff to come clean sooner.