Good time to stop. I spot that rakeback pro churning pattern near the end of your career.

Still doesn't look that bad to me, standard variance really. Point is, you're still pulling a ZepHendix by just focusing on your year when you should be focusing on lifetime, where you really haven't run that bad. I mean, nanonoko, Gomuk and plenty of others I'm sure have run better than you've run bad

gomuk run good???

u however, appear to be pulling a sodom.

lol

obviously its standard variance but in lifetime i havent run good and i think 100k is a lot of money!!??

btw how do you know about gomuk, nano etc running good?

ur just an idiot who makes assertations without any evidence

It's pretty insulting for you to use my name this way. I see you doing it in MSNL too and I it's bothering me. Please stop.

Yea, no evidence at all...just random accusations. Sure

please deliver evidence

Nanonoko supposedly running 300k over ev in a year

For someone who has declared himself so intelligent, you seem to have failed pretty damn hard with this reply.

I generally base all my "facts" on rumours and hear say. supposedly you are a moron... you can't argue against that evidence.

this is more like it

Actually it is a fact to my knowledge...I said supposedly because I personally didn't see it; however, Andrew Song (I believe, could have been someone else), said nanonoko showed him a graph showing this. Just shut up, you don't know what you're talking about.

COMEDY GOLD

Fact to your knowledge? you heard from someone but didn't see it yourself? that sir, is a rumour. So stop with ur **** peddling non stop barrage of moronic comments. Every time you make a post you just look more and more like a ****tard.

I still stand by my evidence that you are ******ed (twosmeets and a dozen other people) say it's true, so must be.

Can a mod ban SecondChance please? The guy is a ****ing idiot who trolls every post.

He's pretty special, am 99% sure he isn't even trying to troll, which takes a very special talent indeed.

It's more than a rumor. The people at the very top are usually the people who have run the best. Moreover, Andrew song has no reason to low about this. If u really care about concrete proof, contact him yourself; I don't really care about proving anything to you

yeah clearly has nothing to do with the volume nanonoko put in.

you proved it to me enough. imma believer

I've actually seen the graph in question, I have no way of knowing if it was indeed Nanonoko's graph but I have no reason to think it wasn't (I'd say I was over 70% sure it was legit and not tampered) and it did indeed show 'him' running roughly 300k over EV for the year and if I remember right there was a second graph which showed him even more than that over EV over a much larger sample. I might even have the graphs saved somewhere on my comp but only have my laptop atm.

The point isn't whether nanonoko is running over ev or not. The point was serial pre-ejaculator secondchance just quips nonsense non stop in regards to many issues and many players, He always says he can back up his claims with evidence and then goes on to state that in this scenario, he heard a rumour (whether the source is good or the graph is correct is immaterial). The fact that he may/may not be correct on one issue isn't relevant compared to the multitude of bull****/bitching he constantly aims at other players without having anyway to back up his **** stirring (such as aimed at hurricane/zep/gomuk etc etc).

If you want a laugh ask him about his drink driving ability or better yet scroll though his posting history. The guy suffers from serious delusions of grandeur while basically failing to accept the fact that he is just another idiot.

+1 pontylad

... pretty interested in finding this mystery graph now lol

Don't normally post her (or even read) but just want to confirm I have seen this mystery graph. Shows Nano ~$250k over ev IIRC. Pretty sure Song posted it in the FTP regs thread if anyone cares to try and dig it up

The point is, I know I'm right about things, some of which I have no way to prove, and some of which I have to spent ample time gathering evidence just to prove to a bunch of 2p2 people I don't really care about.

And, some of my statements are obvious generalizations and don't apply to EVERYONE, e.g. what I said about people who pull a ZepHendrix; however, realistically, people who pull a ZepHendrix are more likely to not be running that bad, and a lot of them are probably running over EV lifetime....the people who ran super bad are the ones no longer playing poker, not bitching about their 30k hand sample.

What is pulling a ZepHendrix? Is it a good or bad thing?