Quote:
Originally Posted by gobbledygeek
I'm pretty sure the thinking is "this spot is awesome, cuz I can only lose $60". For real.
Ginb4havetobeafishtothinklikeone,ldoG
Even if you found the number, I'm not sure how it would be relevant to your strategy? Like let's pretend the answer is 2% (I have zero clue if it actually is or not); so how would that affect how you would go about things?
GcluelessuselessinformationnoobG
A hand tonight made me think of the limp-call $45 hand:
Two limps to me in CO. I raise to $15 with 66. limper flats. 2nd limper min c/r's to $30. We both call. BOTH players CHECK DARK before the flop is dealt and fold to a $30 bet on the flop. The old limp-min 3-bet, dark check-fold strategy
I'm trying to really pin down math to try to make more accurate reads. When trying to sniff out sets, I know they're going to flop them 12% of the time or bink them on turn 4.5% of the time. So, I try to combine the statistical probability of them having a set with their actions and reads.
If someone flops two pair with their ace-rag against my big ace only 1% of the time (I still don't know the exact number), I might just consider that a cooler and ignore it; but as the percentages get higher, you have to consider them more. The odds of them binking their kicker on the turn of river is easier to calculate and a more likely occurrence at 6.6%. In fact, I do find it easier to fold hands when someone turns two pair rather than flops it.