Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
*NG* (Delete after posting, all answers revealed at 12 EST 2/22)- 2/5 Turn Decision *NG* (Delete after posting, all answers revealed at 12 EST 2/22)- 2/5 Turn Decision

02-23-2011 , 02:45 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by venice10
OK, a few minutes late, but here we go.

Hero raised to $100 by tossing in 4 green chips. My rational at the time was that while I've gained some SDV, it isn't much. I'm going to hate roughly 40% of the cards that can come on the river (all queens, jacks and hearts at least, and not be happy about an 8 or 3 either). The pot would be $168 and the effective stack is going to be $220. If the villain wanted to stack off, they would have bet more to make the shove on the river be easier to call if I had something. I'm representing a nut hand. I wanted to take over the hand again and control what happened on the river.

As I've thought about it more after the fact, I've been able to put more rational behind the instinctive move. The first thing is the villain is a level 2 thinker. They are thinking about what I have, not just their hand value. Therefore, a raise on the turn should shock them (and actually did, as the villain immediately did the classic tell of moving away from the table). Old guys don't bluff raise on the turn.

Second, the line makes sense for a nut flush. I could raise pf with an A-broadway hand. I checked the flop looking for a free card and got it. I make a small raise that is enough to get stacks in on the river easily, but offer nearly 4:1, so another "FD" is getting odds to call.

I didn't have the villain on a set because their bet should have been bigger to protect their hand.

Finally, I had position so I could use the raise as a blocking bet. If called on the turn, the likely result was a check on the river that I could check behind. Otherwise, I'm likely to be facing a far larger bet on the river if I just call.

The results. After the villain pushed back from the table, they went into the tank. The villain exposes the T looking for a reaction. I'm in Patrick Antonious world at that point, so there is no reaction. More tanking, then a fold. Hero collects the pot.

As for my plan, I'm folding on the turn to a re-raise. If called, I'm checking behind on the river if checked to. Any hand that calling a raise on the turn will call anything up to stacks on the river, which means a hand that beats mine. If facing a bet on the river, I'd fold. The villain won't lead with less than TP under those circumstances except for a small % of the time, not enough to call.
You are essentially turning your hand into a bluff. If villian showed a T then you are missing value from a river bet that is probably 100% likely since he will likely put you on AhX or air hands in his range like QJ. Your hand has enough showdown value to make the call.

I seriously doubt villian folds any med str K.
*NG* (Delete after posting, all answers revealed at 12 EST 2/22)- 2/5 Turn Decision Quote
02-23-2011 , 02:52 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by schlep
You are essentially turning your hand into a bluff. If villian showed a T then you are missing value from a river bet that is probably 100% likely since he will likely put you on AhX or air hands in his range like QJ. Your hand has enough showdown value to make the call.

I seriously doubt villian folds any med str K.
+1
*NG* (Delete after posting, all answers revealed at 12 EST 2/22)- 2/5 Turn Decision Quote
02-23-2011 , 11:17 PM
Good thread Venice.

So is this line a 'check-raise-turn-for-pot-control-&-as-a-bluff-with-SDV' line?

Last edited by JustinJude; 02-23-2011 at 11:31 PM.
*NG* (Delete after posting, all answers revealed at 12 EST 2/22)- 2/5 Turn Decision Quote
02-24-2011 , 01:13 AM
hmmmm. interesting discussion

after some thought i see the merit in venice's line:

1. we fold out villain's air, which we wouldn't get any value from OTR anyway

2. we get calls from villain's flush draws, which are behind OTT

if a heart peels we can easily fold to a bet from villain or otherwise check back. (not the case if we flat turn)
3. we lose less if villain has TP or better
if we flat called turn and no heart came OTR, we would have to call a reasonable river bet from villain anyway, because his range would still be wide enough that we would be ahead of it with 2nd pair. and the bet would be larger than our raise size ($55). by raising turn, we allow ourselves to get away from the hand easily OTR if we are beat. villain may even reraise his vulnerable made hands like sets OTT and we can easily fold.
*NG* (Delete after posting, all answers revealed at 12 EST 2/22)- 2/5 Turn Decision Quote
02-24-2011 , 01:13 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by meshanti

There is no such thing as a better spot in cash games
There may be no such thing as a better spot right now but there are better places on the river bank to fish if there are other anglers near by.
*NG* (Delete after posting, all answers revealed at 12 EST 2/22)- 2/5 Turn Decision Quote
02-24-2011 , 01:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8o8
hmmmm. interesting discussion

after some thought i see the merit in venice's line:

1. we fold out villain's air, which we wouldn't get any value from OTR anyway

2. we get calls from villain's flush draws, which are behind OTT

if a heart peels we can easily fold to a bet from villain or otherwise check back. (not the case if we flat turn)
3. we lose less if villain has TP or better
if we flat called turn and no heart came OTR, we would have to call a reasonable river bet from villain anyway, because his range would still be wide enough that we would be ahead of it with 2nd pair. and the bet would be larger than our raise size ($55). by raising turn, we allow ourselves to get away from the hand easily OTR if we are beat. villain may even reraise his vulnerable made hands like sets OTT and we can easily fold.



I will have to concede that since this IS live donkapoker, that even decent players otherwise WILL call a moderate sized raise on turn OOP looking to draw. lol And if Venice sees him as being one who would call with his heart + gutty etc, will not 3 bet bluff, and will not spazz bluff river etc, then i will go along with it.

(i was caught up in the fact that he was good, therefore he would only 3 bet or fold on turn). If not, then this truly is viable.
*NG* (Delete after posting, all answers revealed at 12 EST 2/22)- 2/5 Turn Decision Quote
02-24-2011 , 01:15 PM
if my math is right,
if you call turn, the pot is $180, and the stacks remaining are $220??

all the pokerstoving in the world can't get you away from the fact that by calling, we are fully committed,
yet are hoping to slow V down, or whatever, and are certainly folding to a river PSB, or a shove. Hero is gambling that V will slow down, and doesn't have a flush, some other big hand (K), or a bluff he's willing to go all the way with.
pokerstoveing is based on choosing a distribution of Vs range that is 100% geusswork, anyways. (still, everyone nit-picks over it all the time)
the pot to stack ratio isn't even close to being where you would want it to be to take a card off. i would want to be @4 times deeper to make this call.
In a way, hero is on a draw.
drawing that the river isn't a heart, and drawing that V doesn't ship t river regardless of the river card.
putting over a 1/4 of your stack in under these circumstances, in which you may be folding often, is no bueno, and no different than doing it w/ a draw when H does fold river. we see poor players do this all the time; call off a significant % of thier stack, and then fold (when they miss)
*NG* (Delete after posting, all answers revealed at 12 EST 2/22)- 2/5 Turn Decision Quote

      
m