Maybe this
In a couple days I turn 68 and I have been collecting poker books since I was 21. It has always been clear in my mind that when my obligations were over and l quit coaching football, I would retire and focus on poker.

Here I Am

I have over a thousand poker books, the latest ones & some that are hard to find like ‘Easy Game’ , ‘Let Their Be Range’ , ‘The Next Level’ . Once played with Sam Grizzle. So, I’m not like you. There’s a lot of ways that work.

I have trouble with women, but I have dealt with a lot of men in coaching and I size people up very well. When you read a man, that’s info no solver can tell you about.

I’m studying people that tell me what solvers say, but I don’t use solvers, I don’t play online, and I have no European friends with the more technical understandings of the game.

So, I’m not like you, but I make no apologies. I wanted to discuss poker with the young solver guys. I will continue to try to do that. Carry on how you see fit.

It wouldn't matter, it wouldn't maximize anything, if its a random walk with 65% 'up probability' and 35% down then its time invariant.

Some random thoughts around this thread. Waiting for Negreanu to come in and give his best advice