Villain 1 - SB - 60+ white guy more aggressive than villain 2. Relatively tight pf, but has c-bet 100% of the time, and seems to bet out a lot on nothing flops, which makes me think he's been stealing. Stack ~$90

Villain 2- MP - 60+ white guy, playing pretty tight. Watched him raise pf with several hands and when he showed had the goods every time AK, AQ, large pocket pairs. Stack ~$200

Hero - UTG + 1 mid 30s white guy, TAG. Limps with 77. Stack ~$250

4-way limp pot (including BB) going to flop.

Flop: 6h4h2s ($8)

Villain 1 checks, BB checks, I bet $7. Villain 2 calls, Villain 1 calls, BB folds.

Turn: Kd ($29)

Villain 1 checks, I bet $17, Villain 2 calls, Villain 1 calls.

River Ks ($80)

Villain 1 - shoves all in for his last $65

Hero looks at Villain 2 and he looks like he's going to throw his hand away.

Hero?

I went into thought trying to hand-read Villain 1, what sort of hand check calls flop and turn, then shoves river. If he had for example K-x hearts, I would believe he'd lead or c-raise turn with top pair and second nut flush draw. Might also lead if he had a lone King. Also put busted straight draws/ A-wheel card (gutshot draw on flop) in his range. I don't think a set would play the hand this way. Thoughts?

V1 has some Kx hand imo. Limp preflop screwed you. I'd guess KJ or K10. He called the 7$ with two overs.

Sent from my Z958 using Tapatalk

Delete

I basically never open limp but as played it seems like you might have 88 and 99 here which are better calls to go along with whatever Kx you have. I get your thought process esp if villain behind is obviously ready to muck but I think you can fold this hand without a better read that V is capable of bluffing beyond c betting.