Quote:
Originally Posted by skydiver8
I agree with everyone, the call pre based on numbers alone is spew. normally I'd fold here pre because I'm a huge nit. V2 isn't a great player, but he KNOWS this about me.
One detail I forgot to mention in my OP that I should have, totally an oversight on my part, was that several people, myself included, were "free-rolling" this game because we had won money in the promo drawings earlier in the day. I'm sure this contributed to the maniacal nature of the game.
I did let the game dynamics affect my play, and perhaps this was a mistake, but on the other hand, perhaps it actually made me play better (more like i "should") against these particular villains when I didn't have to fold J5o for 4 hours in a row.
I guess my question next is, how often do you guys play a hand based more on reads of the villains than pure math? I'm not trying to make excuses for my preflop call, just trying to explain my thoughts. This is a move I've seen the guy make with AK, AQ, and AJ a lot. He actually had more of a tendency to flat with his big pairs.
I guess tend to put too much stock in the psychology aspects of live poker, especially when I'm up against a KNOWN bluffer. Mainly because I find it very interesting.
All the stuff about playing the player, reads, image, etc...does it just not matter at all in a hand like this, in a game like this?
results later. Needless to say, aside from the d-bag first poster I quoted, I learned a lesson here, not based on results, but based on the feedback. still interested in thoughts on my questions, though.
Well, I'll try...
As you can see from my first response, I currently rely primarily on math and I'm a TAG player. My regular poker room is huge with many, many opponents. I see and play against regulars, but I have to deal with a lot of new faces. I have to rely on math first. Several years ago, I regularly played in a much smaller room against the same opponents and could more readily utilize what I like to call the "art" aspects of poker that you are alluding to.
First of all, congrats on the free-roll...if you want to go for it and gamble up the money, more power to you. However, just because everyone else was doing it doesn't necessarily mean that it was the optimal strategy.
Looking back on your original post and what I've quoted above, I feel that you made the poorest choice in calling. My first choice is still folding because even crazy bluffers are dealt monsters from time-to-time. I've already talked about the math. I think this is the smart play.
My second choice if and only if I REALLY knew these opponents (perhaps better than they know themselves) would be to shove pre-flop. At least then you would have two ways to win. I still think that V1 has been dealt a premium hand and at best you are flipping against two overcards. But, if you're truly "tired of V1 pushing you around", "wanting to take a stand" and "bored from being card dead so long" (that one is a big leak) and "not wanting to play like a p*ssy" then shoving your stack is the way to go. In your particular circumstance only (knowing the players) I think this is the ballsy play. I've personally witnessed a female poker playing acquaintance of mine making a very similar play with a worse starting hand then yours and exposing it to the table after the pushy male villain mucked...very impressive.
What you did (calling) with this hand is terrible IMO and most likely the only reason this thread exists is because the flop is 8-high. I don't even want to label calling off 40% of your effective stack (math again) a 3rd choice. You can hope for a flopped set, but we already know the math makes this an unprofitable play. You were actually weak-passive pre-flop and I'm sorry to say "played like a p*ssy" at this moment in the hand. The call with your hand is the weak play. In all sincerity, what were you hoping or expecting to happen later in the hand after making this call? Did you have a plan?
So now you're self-stuck. You got nearly the best result possible in an 8-high rainbow flop. You've got nothing to lose now (except for $335) IMO by shoving over the top of V1 and trying to push out V2.
OK, I've gotten a bit off-track here and didn't mean to be harsh by using your quotes from other posts to make my point. I don't think anyone here can give you a quality answer based on all the historical and psychological aspects of this hand in your game. In summary, what I'm trying to state is that ALL the past history, reads, table image perceptions, game dynamics etc. is important, but I feel the best place to apply those in this situation with those stacks and your hand is pre-flop.
Hope this somehow helps...am interested in reading the results.