It's like there's a "virus of the mind" on this forum, that people don't give nits enough respect.

Everyone acts like they don't know how nits win, but then these threads feature a lot of donations to them (in this case the flop and turn calls).

Nice screen name though.

Cheap lesson going forward

And you're the first to comment on the SN, appreciate it.

do these people really exist, raising only QQ+
i´ve labeled many guys nits only to be surprised how whacky they sometimes play, without reason.
does this guy really have the self discipline phil hellmuth wants to reach? is he immune to tilting, boredom, having a favourite hand, not wanting to go to the cardroom to just fold for 3 hours, etc?
you probably played with the guy about 100 hands, you flopped an overpair, he bet really small, you didnt go crazy and just called, nh. even made a very tight, good fold on the river.

can´t really call those plays donations, give him a somewhat normal and not ubernitty range, include the live wtf factor which is all reasonable imo, and you have easy flop and turn calls.

I'm with sauhund. This guy isn't a nit. Someone who is "limp folding preflop often" which to me means probably an average of ~twice an orbit isn't a nit. They're just weak tight. A dude who would have online stats of 37/2 is just not a nit.

I think more often than not these kind of players often raise larger than the standard open of the rest of the table. They haven't raised for 3 hours, the standard open for the table is $10 without any limpers behind, but they have QQ+ so it's $15. I'm curious if $13 was a large raise pf or not at that table that night. The problem is you only bet a bluff and can just get a much, much better spot.

His VPIP was no where close to 37, but you're right on his PFR 2. He's likley 10/2. The standard raise at the table is 12-15, and you're right about there being a better spot which is why i think the turn is not a great call by me.