Pre-flop:
Villain is a competent player, but can be VERY spewey. Only seen him play a few times, and from what I remember, fairly aggressive, both pre-flop and post. Has been playing a lot of pots, haven't seen him 3bet yet, only been a few orbits.
Effective stacks are $400, Villain is up big this session. In a previous hand, he three barreled into, and was called down by Hero's TPTK on 3 streets (he had air presumably).
Hero: Image is competent, fairly TAG, ABC player, won't get out of line too often.
Hero opens to 8$ in middle position with A
K
, gets one caller and Villain 3bets to 30$ from the BB. Hero calls the 30$ (should I 4b in this spot?) and initial callers calls as well. (90$ in pot). I'm putting him on a wide range here. Haven't played with him much, and I'm not sure of his 3bet tendencies, but I'm guessing 99+ or AK, and rags as well.
Flop K
Q
6
. Villain leads out for 45$, Hero flats. 3rd guy folds. (this is fairly standard, right? no reason for a raise).
Turn: K
, villain leads out for 75$. Hero flats. Is this the right play with top trips top kicker and the NFD? I flatted because I felt there was no way he would call without a K, and QQ was definitely in his range. Slight chance of KQ as well. Moreover, I figured if a
hit on the river, villain could fire a third bullet if he had air, hoping I didn't have a
.
River: 10
. Villain leads out for 100$ into a $330 pot. Hero?
Note: longtime lurker, first post. Feel free to give me contructive criticism of how I explained the hand, and what details I should include in future posts to get better feedback!