Quote:
Originally Posted by coxquinn
^I would not bet that interested, especially if it would require paying a monthly fee. If it's that big an investment on your side I doubt enough people will sign-up.
Yeah I would charge 10$ a month, with better rates for bulk-time. But I probably will need 50 or more VMs running TST 24/7 and also it is a very large time investment just keeping them all running properly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by teddyFBI
I used to subscribe to each of PT3 and HEM's server-side scanning, and at first thought that no client-side scanning tool would ever be able to match server-side scanning...but now I realize it's because PT3 and HEM's client-side scanning tools sucked balls. TST is the nuts and -- as I think you pointed out to me at some point during an IM chat -- server-side scanning will be orders of magnitude slower than client-side...for example, I can set TST to permascan every 10 seconds...I wouldn't have any sort of control over that via a server-side solution...but don't let me speak for other people; maybe there's enough demand out there for it. Just 2 cents, coming from someone who used to use PT3 and HEM's server-side scanners religiously, and now realize how much better a good client-side scanner like TST actually is.
if you don't start charging for this in the next 2 weeks, i'm gonna start passing around the hat on your behalf.
Thanks
Well I do think there are some good uses for it. Also there are situations where it could be faster, or as fast as client side scanning, for example if you're scanning 100+ tables at .25/.50 on stars, if on the server side I actually had like 3 or 4 different instances scanning .25/.50 on stars, then the server's data would definitely be updated more frequently than your own. I would have autoscan running on a 0sec interval on the server side so you wouldn't have to worry about that either. And also it could be nice if you have a slow computer and want to scan a lot of tables on multiple sites. But of course, I do agree with everything you're saying
Quote:
Originally Posted by WayneX2
Hi,
2 bugs to report, both in relation to the table hud.
1. When playing on party and you get disconnected, after reconnection tst will no longer display the table hud even if you close tst and rescan all tables. However on any new tables opened the table hud works perfectly. This bug has been happening for a while but I kept forgetting about it.
2. Since the last update, when viewing players on the table hud you have to scroll down to see the last player. This happens when there are 3, 4, 5 etc players so doesn't seem to be related to a particular number. This is happening on party nl 6 max tables btw. I think I explained it clearly enough but I can get a screenshot if required.
Thanks
Thanks,
1) I know about the issue, I will try to fix it. The problem is that after a disconnect they change the titles of the table and throw random numbers in it. But I should be able to fix that
2) If you could email a screenshot, it would help,
zandry@tablescanturbo.com , I am not having that problem. What I have seen before is that if the playerlist is not wide enough, then the horizontal scrollbar is shown, and the playerlist height adjustment code doesn't properly account for the horizontal scrollbar so you have to scroll down. I should be able to fix that too. But an easy fix you can do now is to make the columns less wide, or you can increase the playerlist width in Hud > Configure > Appearance, then it should work properly I'd think