Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
NoteCaddy NoteCaddy

03-11-2014 , 06:50 PM
If you click file->synchronize->export notes to text file, is the text file that pops up empty?

For more info/ideas see: http://wiki.assaultware.com/My-notes...the_Database_2
NoteCaddy Quote
03-11-2014 , 07:01 PM
I've been playing all day and notes have been being generated, so that text file will include data.

Fwiw I ran an analyze on a definition earlier and it showed up as I would expect, so it seems that the data is there, but it's as if my HUD is filtering out data from processed HH's and only showing data produced live in-play since I created the new db.
NoteCaddy Quote
03-12-2014 , 06:15 AM
Ok I reinstalled the latest HM2 update 2.0.0.8004, reprocessed my notes and it's all working fine now.

When you said this below, did you mean that I shouldn't be downloading and using the 2.5 beta until you release a new one?

Quote:
Originally Posted by SretiCentV
You should use the latest hm2 official release http://forums.holdemmanager.com/hm2-...ck-thread.html which doesn't have the 2.5 beta until there is a new 2.5 uploaded which will be announced in the official thread http://forums.holdemmanager.com/note...lory-love.html
Also I made two new note definitions over the weekend while I was running the 2.5 beta. Now I've rolled back, those definitions have disappeared. Have you any idea where they would have gone, or will I just have to make them again?
NoteCaddy Quote
03-12-2014 , 07:01 AM
Hi,

I have a question regarding the "Action Sequences", will changes apply to all definitions that are using that specific "Action Sequences" if I make a change?

Ex.
Let say I making a definition to see how often someone Check/Call the flop in 3bet pots Out of Position. Now I want to make the same definition but see how often he Check / Raise in this spot.

Normally to do this I just open the Check/Call definition a made. Change the name of the definition in the General tab and change the Flop "Action Sequences" to raise instead of Call, then I press save new.

But I am worried this is the wrong way to do it and it might affect the first definition.
NoteCaddy Quote
03-12-2014 , 10:53 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PokerRon247
Ok I reinstalled the latest HM2 update 2.0.0.8004, reprocessed my notes and it's all working fine now.

When you said this below, did you mean that I shouldn't be downloading and using the 2.5 beta until you release a new one?
The new one was released yesterday evening. 2.0.0.8004 has the stable NC 2.4 release though so you may be more comfortable with that one.

Quote:
Also I made two new note definitions over the weekend while I was running the 2.5 beta. Now I've rolled back, those definitions have disappeared. Have you any idea where they would have gone, or will I just have to make them again?
Close hm2. Open them in notepad and change where it says <priority>0.0 to <priority>0

basically just get rid of the .0 which makes it incompatible with 2.4

Quote:
Originally Posted by albin
Hi,

I have a question regarding the "Action Sequences", will changes apply to all definitions that are using that specific "Action Sequences" if I make a change?

Ex.
Let say I making a definition to see how often someone Check/Call the flop in 3bet pots Out of Position. Now I want to make the same definition but see how often he Check / Raise in this spot.

Normally to do this I just open the Check/Call definition a made. Change the name of the definition in the General tab and change the Flop "Action Sequences" to raise instead of Call, then I press save new.
This is 100% exactly what I do.

Quote:
But I am worried this is the wrong way to do it and it might affect the first definition.
This is a legit concern and I actually thought about how I could express that to people especially with 2.5 having a bunch of pre-made sequences.

Changing a sequence in one definition will never affect sequences in other definitions. I think some people would rather they did but no chance that will happen since that would lead to horrific side effects.
NoteCaddy Quote
03-12-2014 , 11:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SretiCentV
Close hm2. Open them in notepad and change where it says <priority>0.0 to <priority>0

basically just get rid of the .0 which makes it incompatible with 2.4
Thanks, done this and they've reappeared. When searching for the files I found a ton of backup folders. It seems NC backs up note definitions almost every day, and each one of these folders was about 10MB. Is this normal? Am I ok to just delete them?
NoteCaddy Quote
03-12-2014 , 11:33 AM
Yes, it's normal. You can erase them without problem. Keep the latest one as backup just in case you need it.
NoteCaddy Quote
03-13-2014 , 04:26 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SretiCentV
The new one was released yesterday evening. 2.0.0.8004 has the stable NC 2.4 release though so you may be more comfortable with that one.



Close hm2. Open them in notepad and change where it says <priority>0.0 to <priority>0

basically just get rid of the .0 which makes it incompatible with 2.4



This is 100% exactly what I do.



This is a legit concern and I actually thought about how I could express that to people especially with 2.5 having a bunch of pre-made sequences.

Changing a sequence in one definition will never affect sequences in other definitions. I think some people would rather they did but no chance that will happen since that would lead to horrific side effects.
Does this means that I even can delete some confusing "Action Sequences" that I made in the past without affecting old definitions which I might still use?
NoteCaddy Quote
03-13-2014 , 05:33 PM
correct
NoteCaddy Quote
03-15-2014 , 11:14 AM
If setting "effective stack size" to certain amount then sb is actually setted effective stack size + small blind. Bb is correct.
NoteCaddy Quote
03-15-2014 , 01:00 PM
Is there a way to get a variabe to show if we are IP or OOP?

And is there a way to add deeper stacks for $effectivestacksize. stacks above 121BBs are shown 121BB+

I would love to have 121-180bb, 181-250bb, 251+ BBs
NoteCaddy Quote
03-16-2014 , 07:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durrnuff
If setting "effective stack size" to certain amount then sb is actually setted effective stack size + small blind. Bb is correct.
Are you saying the SB's effective is measured too high? I'm not entirely clear on what you mean here.

Quote:
Originally Posted by rh300487
Is there a way to get a variabe to show if we are IP or OOP?
$flopposition
http://wiki.assaultware.com/NoteCaddy-Variables.ashx

Quote:
And is there a way to add deeper stacks for $effectivestacksize. stacks above 121BBs are shown 121BB+

I would love to have 121-180bb, 181-250bb, 251+ BBs
You have to make separate definitions and filter for each. Power users rarely agree with the way variables render values but then again they wouldn't agree with each other either
NoteCaddy Quote
03-16-2014 , 07:27 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SretiCentV
Are you saying the SB's effective is measured too high? I'm not entirely clear on what you mean here.
Yes. If you set "effective stack size" min and max to same amount. Sb is not correct, because somewhy it adds small blind value to it making effective stack bigger by small blind.
NoteCaddy Quote
03-17-2014 , 08:55 PM
Hi I am a user of the standalone version of NC2. I havent used NC in quite some time because I took a very long break from poker. Well today I fired it up for the first time in close to a year, let it update but now it doesnt work at all.

Whenever I tell it to color code for stars it just sits there for about 5 minutes and then the program stops working. During this time there is zero progress in the task processor tab. Some help getting it working again would be great.

Thanks
NoteCaddy Quote
03-18-2014 , 05:27 PM
Please submit a log file so I can see what happens http://wiki.assaultware.com/How-to-m...o-support.ashx
NoteCaddy Quote
03-18-2014 , 09:05 PM
Hi thanks for your response. I followed the directions on the link you provided however I cannot locate the notecaddy log.txt file.

There is only one line of data in the error log file so I am pasting it here:
Quote:
3:16:43 AM exeption coloring stars at NoteCaddy.Contents.ColorCoding.CreateStarsColors.M jrnA7y24(Object , DoWorkEventArgs )
NoteCaddy Quote
03-19-2014 , 08:17 AM
That log file gets created 100% of the time even if you don't turn on logging...

What you can do is:
1. Copy the notecaddy.latest.zip over your installation http://wiki.assaultware.com/How-to-m...ddy-build.ashx
2. Clear all settings http://wiki.assaultware.com/Resettin...-settings.ashx
3. Point to your pokerstars notes again. Remember it's notes.playername.xml, not notes.xml.
NoteCaddy Quote
03-19-2014 , 08:47 PM
Hey thanks again for your help so far. I tried everything you said to do exactly and I still had the exact same problem so I tried uninstalling. With a bit of tinkering I am now able to get it to run the color code process on an old pt3 DB.

I do remember now that notecaddy did not support pt4 in the past but I dont know if it is supported now or not. If thats the reason for my troubles then I apologize for wasting your time. Its not that big a deal for me to export hands into a pt3 db every day and then run nc off of that.
NoteCaddy Quote
03-19-2014 , 09:32 PM
Okay definitely working fine now as long as I have note caddy set to read from a PT3 db. Thanks again for your time.
NoteCaddy Quote
03-20-2014 , 07:05 AM
Right, there's no pt4 support currently. It shouldn't have let you select a pt4 database though. Was it during the setup wizard or in setting where you were able to do so?
NoteCaddy Quote
03-20-2014 , 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by SretiCentV
Right, there's no pt4 support currently. It shouldn't have let you select a pt4 database though. Was it during the setup wizard or in setting where you were able to do so?
It just shows up in the database settings tab with all my pt3 db's.

Also, as far as i can tell there is no way to save changes in the database settings tab without closing the tab and then clicking save. This isnt the most intuitive way for the software to work because I thought that when I checked/unchecked databases that the changes were being applied right away so I ruled out the idea that my problem had to do with pt4.
NoteCaddy Quote
03-20-2014 , 09:14 PM
I have 4 million hands, and have deselected all but 4 notes, and have 5 colour codes. Any idea how much memory that's gunna take up?
NoteCaddy Quote
03-21-2014 , 07:23 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Durrnuff
If setting "effective stack size" to certain amount then sb is actually setted effective stack size + small blind. Bb is correct.
Don't know how effective stack is measured right, but as long as i have known it means basically only stack size not counting any blinds. Beginner.

If you want to check then easiest way is HU game...
lets say blinds are 10/20 and set effective stack to 20.

In reality notecaddy will show:
SB (raise) 600 and BB 400 (correct), but another way around...
SB (raise) 410 and BB 590 (not correct?).

Is it correct and i have understand effective stack wrong?
NoteCaddy Quote
03-21-2014 , 06:02 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Queen6Suited
I have 4 million hands, and have deselected all but 4 notes, and have 5 colour codes. Any idea how much memory that's gunna take up?
Not much but it matters how often a note is issued. If one of your definitions is to measure how many hands someone has played then it's going to take a lot more space than if it measures check/min raises on monotone boards, for example.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Durrnuff
Don't know how effective stack is measured right, but as long as i have known it means basically only stack size not counting any blinds. Beginner.

If you want to check then easiest way is HU game...
lets say blinds are 10/20 and set effective stack to 20.

In reality notecaddy will show:
SB (raise) 600 and BB 400 (correct), but another way around...
SB (raise) 410 and BB 590 (not correct?).

Is it correct and i have understand effective stack wrong?
Indeed effective stack doesn't count money committed non voluntarily. Some people like this, some people don't
NoteCaddy Quote
03-31-2014 , 07:17 AM
Is there a way to show the samplesize for the composite definitions? :/
NoteCaddy Quote

      
m