Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
New Tableselection Software: SpadeEye New Tableselection Software: SpadeEye

11-22-2006 , 02:10 PM
It gave me a single day for the trial period? Strange, but I like it enough to buy either way.
11-22-2006 , 02:26 PM
That must be a bug, or the homepage was down...

Restarting SpadeEye might help...
11-22-2006 , 04:43 PM
Quote:
Any time frame on the Stars update yet?
11-22-2006 , 11:21 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Any time frame on the Stars update yet?
11-23-2006 , 01:12 AM
Quote:
That must be a bug, or the homepage was down...

Restarting SpadeEye might help...
The homepage was indeed down, because when I went to the homepage to purchase it I coudln't get through. It loaded up fine this evening. I really like it so far though, very nice job.
11-23-2006 , 02:04 AM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Any time frame on the Stars update yet?
Hi.

Past 1-2 weeks i had no time to update SpadeEye that frequent as before, because tomorrow i have my first diploma thesis presentation.
So from Wednesday on there will be progress again...
11-23-2006 , 07:07 AM
I get a message from party that I have been innactive for a while and I have to press Ok to re estabish connection. WHy is this happening?
11-25-2006 , 12:34 AM
Quote:
Any new time frame on the Stars update yet?
11-25-2006 , 02:30 AM
Quote:
Quote:
Any new time frame on the Stars update yet?
while your all bugging the crap out of this poor guy to get stars done, it's almost completely useless without a built-in dataminer, unless you already have a large database.

i, personally, am nervous to use available dataminers for stars due to t&c that they know about. but if spadeeye has a built in one for stars they won't know what to look for and screen scraping will be almost useless (if i'm thinking about this correctly)
11-25-2006 , 05:36 AM
Quote:
while your all bugging the crap out of this poor guy to get stars done, it's almost completely useless without a built-in dataminer, unless you already have a large database.

while i appeciate your sentiments, this statement is probably completely opposite of the truth.

if he were to incorporate a stars dataminer into this software, then it would probably go immediately onto stars prohibited software list.

so adding such a feature would make it useless for stars usage.

better to find different applications to accomplish your stars datmining, if you are intent on doing that.
11-25-2006 , 07:33 AM
Quote:
if he were to incorporate a stars dataminer into this software, then it would probably go immediately onto stars prohibited software list.

so adding such a feature would make it useless for stars usage.
11-25-2006 , 02:46 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Any new time frame on the Stars update yet?
while your all bugging the crap out of this poor guy to get stars done, it's almost completely useless without a built-in dataminer, unless you already have a large database.

i, personally, am nervous to use available dataminers for stars due to t&c that they know about. but if spadeeye has a built in one for stars they won't know what to look for and screen scraping will be almost useless (if i'm thinking about this correctly)
I am not bugging the crap out of him, I am just asking the same question, and I only do it after his previous time frame has passed, or he has replied to other questions.

I haven't sent a single PM or email "bugging" Mr Snood because he has better things to do.

Regarding the dataminer, I am not looking for his program to datamine, all I want it to do is open the tables.

And as far as the Stars TOC, I have nothing at risk...
11-25-2006 , 10:14 PM
deleted by 2easy.
12-01-2006 , 03:19 AM
Any updates on Stars support Snood? Been a while since we've heard from you.
12-01-2006 , 06:44 PM
Quote:
Any updates on Stars support Snood? Been a while since we've heard from you.
12-02-2006 , 03:45 PM
Hi.

Version 1.86 is ready for download:
http://www.spadeit.com/download.php

Unfortunately its not looking good for the Stars support.
There are some problems, i can not find an answer for.

So with version 1.86 I hope to fix the crashing at Doyles
to move to the next step in finishing Tribeca support.

P.S. Everybody should be able to test this new version...
12-03-2006 , 09:12 AM
hello,

so are you still up to make spadeEye working with stars or have you dismissed this idea?

concerning the doyles vs stars statement on your homepage:
what about making a version of spadeEye special for stars so you dont have problems with doyles?
12-03-2006 , 10:31 PM
Quote:
Unfortunately its not looking good for the Stars support.
There are some problems, i can not find an answer for.
Is there any way you can set it up to just open tables on Stars for predetermined limits and players?

For example, open all tables with at least 5 players at 5-10NL and 10-20NL.

That's all I am looking for it to be able to do.
12-04-2006 , 02:13 PM
Quote:
Quote:
Unfortunately its not looking good for the Stars support.
There are some problems, i can not find an answer for.
Is there any way you can set it up to just open tables on Stars for predetermined limits and players?

For example, open all tables with at least 5 players at 5-10NL and 10-20NL.

That's all I am looking for it to be able to do.
12-04-2006 , 07:05 PM
I can give it a try
12-04-2006 , 07:21 PM
Quote:
I can give it a try
It would be greatly appreciated!
12-06-2006 , 02:05 AM
I'm using 1.86 (demo) for auto-mining party. it works great except it doesn't close the windows once the table breaks down. I've configured it so that it should close the table when less than 4 players on it but i haven't seen it close a single table yet even if the table is empty.

Any ideas?
12-06-2006 , 11:00 AM
Please add the deep stack limits for FT.
12-06-2006 , 11:53 AM
I've tried version 1.86 at Doyle's room. It opens tables and scans the lobby as it should, but the fullscan doesn't show which players are seated or any statistics except the potsize.

PS: The prolem is not that I haven't added the right databases.
12-06-2006 , 08:53 PM
The "deep stack" tables are already added.

Take a look at "Main"->"Options"->"limit".
There you can set the deepstack tables to be datamined.

      
m