I read OP said something about merging his graph or something? Is there a new feature I don't know about in an update? I've been using an older version and haven't updated in months.
The only issue that remains is it misses hands in cash games, I've been keeping logs of PT and manually counted the hand logs and my cashier before and after a session from the poker client and there's a couple missing after a decent sample, sometimes less. You might say it's nitpicking but a few hands can really make the overall figures inaccurate and in some cases, to the extreme. Sometimes for more money, but more often for less. Everything else is running as smooth as can be on win7. I'm afraid to update since "it ain't broke". I can work around this for now and have been doing so once I suspected something wasn't right months ago. If you guys can literally import every hand and do so accurately, it would save me some time. On the plus side, I should be doing this anyway but that's another story.
Basically, I am keeping manual records along with an app on mobile devices because the results are not the actual results via PT. It's 99% accurate with the percentage of hands imported and everything runs so good. That 1% will skew the numbers by a ton more than that. The sample shown is over a two month period of semi-decent regular volume. I can't imagine how off they'd be after a few years or even months. I'm hoping you guys get this line error thing sorted out soon, I know you're trying to fix this along with dozens of other bugs and features at the same time, so I trust it's high on your ASAP list.
I want to use PT for the detailed stats but it's not accurate, so there's no point. I have to stick to using the very basic, but accurate stats and single graph from a mobile device. I still rely on PT for some stats like session length and dates but that's about it when it comes to keep actual records about my results.
Hope you don't think I went overboard (how can you not?) but I started trying to make it short but remembered I had been compiling proof and unexpectedly decided two months was a decent enough of a sample to display for now to prove my point. Thanks again, if it weren't for you guys, I'd be using H.I./T.I. right now... now THAT'S a bad beat. That or the fact that I own both of them, collecting software dust.