Sure, just manually edit the ranges, lock them, and then run a fresh Nash Calculation (green button in the toolbar). Use the reset option for sampling in this case.

Hi - so it's not possible to save a sim to come back to and continue analysing (nodelocking etc) later?

I'm running beta. I can't even get it to open in 'read only'.

Steps I have taken:
1. Clicked the 'floppy disk' icon to save my sim locally on my PC
2. Upon my return, tried and failed to open it. (It doesn't find the file type in the save location.)

Please try updating to the latest version, there was an issue in a previous version where files wouldn't be saved with the correct .hrcz file extension.

Rename the files to .hrcz and you should be able to load them.

ty

Hi guys, is this a bug or something I misconfigured? On the left, the SB overcall vs UTG opens and BTN calls and on the right the same spot, but with the monkersolver solution

Configs


I ran to subtree 3000m, reset regret
I used version 3.0

Just a difference in configuration most likely, we're generally seeing very similar results if the tree config is equivalent. If you configured the hand in the UI then BB can't flat call if SB flats. If BB is allowed to flat in Monker then this would explain the difference.

You could try this with a scripted build and enable the BB call for a 4-way pot:
https://www.holdemresources.net/blog...ional-examples

(Set allowed flats vs opens to 2 and keep "Always allow flats closing the action" set to true.)

Max active players 8 is probably a waste of resources btw unless this is a KO hand. You likely don't need more than 5-way pots.

Maybe a bit niche but please bear with: is it possible to 'save' payouts so that I don't have to enter them again?

Scenario:
1. I sim a spot ITM with, say, 150 players remaining.
2. I save sim.
3. I come back the next day and want to sim a different spot from same game, ITM with, say, 100 remaining.

Any way I can open and copy payouts from my original sim to save me having to enter them from scratch the next day in the new sim I want to run?

So, ideally just save the payout after entering it, you can do so directly in the hand setup.

But if you forgot that there is a way to retrieve the structure from the save file:
*) Go to Tools: Structure Manager and select a structure, click the export button. This will create a .json file, let's say structure.json.
*) Rename your .hrcz hand file to .zip and extract it, you'll get a settings.json file.
*) Open both the structure file from earlier and the settings.json in a text editor, copy/paste the structure part from the settings file to the structure.json.
*) Import the structure.json back into HRC at Tools: Structure Manager.

how i create this script?

I think the advanced script posted here actually covers almost everything, except for the varying 3-bet sizes between UTG+1 to BTN.

Besides the sizing, the main thing you'd need to change is to increase the allowed flats against opens from 1 to 2 and keep "additionally allow flats if they close the action" enabled.

That's in line 73 of the script, change:
To:
Everything else should be easy to adjust, it's explained within the script file and you really just need to change the numbers of the various sizings.

Let me know if the script works fine for you otherwise, we can look into the varied 3-bet sizings then.

If you need any help with the customization of sizings etc:
https://discord.gg/T3v5dGPuHb

(I assume you would like to have Postflop 4-way enabled for that rfi+bu+sb+bb scenario? By default 4-way is checked down after the TURN, this can be changed at line 109 if you prefer a full 4-way calculation.)

Does blinds rollback affect ICM at GG poker final two tables?

I'm not familiar with the structure. Does this simply decrease the blinds when reaching final two tables?

"Vanilla" ICM does not take the size of the blinds into account at all, so a change of the blinds won't have any effect for the equity estimates. (FGS does consider blind size, but that's only available for the final table anyway.)

I was considering how the opportunity 10bb to become 20bb without variation affect some way ICM.

Regular ICM only takes the payout structure and the stacks as input for calculating the value of the stacks. For a regular ICM calculations it literally makes no difference whatsoever if you cut the blinds in half for the next hand or if you double them, it will value all stacks exactly the same regardless of the blind change.

The blinds of the current hand are obviously important, but only because they affect the resulting stacks at the end of the hand. Changes to the blinds after the current hand is over don't matter for plain ICM.

Thank you for your comprehensive answer. I just want to clarify for myself this specific scenario.

Hello, please answer a few questions.
1)What is the difference between algorithms Math and Monte Carlo for Multi table "ICM" for knockout situations?
I get almost the same answers for both algorithms.
2)Are knockouts counted in postflop beta?
3)If I am using Monte Carlo with knockout and postflop calculations, how do I determine the required number of iterations?

Thank you!

> What is the difference between algorithms Math and Monte Carlo for Multi table "ICM" for knockout situations?

In general the equity models are calculated in exactly the same way for both modes, so there are no differences for MTT KOs specifically. If you disable the Postflop model and leave the maximum active player limit at 3 in Monte Carlo mode then results will typically be quite similar. The only difference in this case would be that Monte Carlo mode considers card bunching (ie card removal effects from folded ranges).

You can find a detailed comparison here:
https://www.holdemresources.net/blog...nte-carlo-mode

> Are knockouts counted in postflop beta?

Yes. The equity models, including KOs and MTT, work as usual with the Postflop trees. (When using FGS, remember that this will always simulate push-or-fold for future rounds though.)

> If I am using Monte Carlo with knockout and postflop calculations, how do I determine the required number of iterations?

You can use the estimated tree size in GB x 2500m as a rough guideline. E.g. for a tree with 0.5GB size you could go for 0.5 x 2500m = 1250m samples. Note that this is is a very rough rule of thumb and probably too much for large trees. Check the thread for more information on the sampling, this comes up a lot.

Hello I ve just recently purchased HRC for 1 year but i never got the email, ive checked junk mail the lot and for some reason i cant even email support from my main email add !???

I've re-sent the key to your registered address.

Edit: Actually that email bounced again, your inbox is full. Please clear some space and then email me again.

how can i connect specific 3bet sizes to each position vs specific opener

for example

hj rfi 2.2x btn 3bets 6bb
co rfi 2.2x btn 3bet 5.5bb

Hm, do you want to define every combination of rfi and 3bettor separately, or use a default size and only override a few combinations?

Ideally, stop by the discord and pm me what you want to do and what script you currently use, it's easier to send files back and forth there.

There haven't been many requests using the general player positions so far (except for BU/blinds). This is actually a part of the current scripting API that I'm not particularly happy with and that I'd like to improve.

Hello! Do i understand correctly that it is better to use monte-carlo mode, because it considers card bunching?

In general, yes. I'd recommend new users to start out with the regular Math mode, because that's a bit easier to to use. (EVs update automatically, don't need to worry about sampling sizes for rare lines etc.)

Experienced users should mainly stick to Monte Carlo.

Any Black Friday sales?

how can i see the nash distance or accuracy of a preflop sim?