ICM HoldemResources Calculator [HRC] - Page 18 - Poker Software -- Two Plus Two Poker Forums

Essentially yes, keep in mind though that folds also affect the simulation frequencies. For BU open shoving to be to be sampled, all players before the BU must have folded first.

If CO opens a 100% range then we are actually never sampling BU opens, you'd need to change the CO range first to get any BU opening samples.

Quote

11-28-2019 , 12:23 AM

#427

skara

newbie

Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 32

I am running a basic monte carlo hand in the beta. When I run the same hand with the exact same parameters multiple times it shows slightly different results each time. Why does this happen?

Quote

11-28-2019 , 01:02 AM

#428

skara

newbie

Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 32

In fact quite a large difference

Quote

11-28-2019 , 03:35 AM

#429

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,557

Monte Carlo hands use random sampling to estimate EVs, so it's normal to see some randomness in the results.

The difference with the default number of samples is quite large in your example. Try running additional samples using the "Run Nash Calculation" button in the toolbar. As the sample size grows, the differences should become negligible.

Quote

11-28-2019 , 04:07 AM

#430

skara

newbie

Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 32

thanks for the quick response plexiq.
I tried your suggestion but the results barely changed.
If i reduce the number of max players to 3 (previous parameter was 9) the difference between multiple trials is a lot less, so perhaps this is the solution?
Do you have any other suggestions?

Quote

11-28-2019 , 04:23 AM

#431

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,557

I definitely wouldn't use max 9 players by default, unless you actually need lines like that. Those lines will create very large pots and introduce a lot of variance in the simulation, so they will require a lot of samples to converge.

If you run enough samples they should eventually converge even with 9 active players, it's just going to take longer. How many samples did you run? The default 5-10 million will probably be way too low, try a few hundred million.

Quote

11-28-2019 , 06:28 AM

#432

skara

newbie

Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 32

I havent changed the sample size so yes it must be the default setting. How do I change this?
thanks again for the help

Quote

11-28-2019 , 06:33 AM

#433

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,557

Simply calculate the hand first and then run additional samples.

If you click on on the green "Run Nash Calculation" button in the toolbar, there is a slider that controls the number of samples to run. I believe 5m is the default.

Quote

11-28-2019 , 06:41 AM

#434

skara

newbie

Join Date: Jan 2016 Posts: 32

Thanks heaps man that works, i am getting stable results now

Quote

11-28-2019 , 10:27 PM

#435

Ortega

enthusiast

Join Date: Jul 2015 Posts: 64

Quote:

Originally Posted by plexiq

It's of course taken into account by the calculations, but there is currently no explicit display of risk premiums. This has recently been asked for a few times and I'll see what i can do about adding an explicit risk premium display to the beta in the near future.

any news about this?

Quote

11-28-2019 , 11:42 PM

#436

Ortega

enthusiast

Join Date: Jul 2015 Posts: 64

HRC will read the new PP's HH?

Quote

11-29-2019 , 04:26 AM

#437

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,557

Bubble Factor display will happen after the current beta is released, that's just a few days away though.

New PP HHs: Assuming all the necessary information is available in a .txt file, we'll add support for it. I don't have any information about the changes in their HHs though, is that change live yet? If so, please send us a few HH examples so we can add support.

Quote

11-29-2019 , 06:31 PM

#438

Empathy240

newbie

Join Date: Apr 2019 Posts: 45

hold em resource calculator is extremely laggy for me and always runs my laptop to 100% cpu even piosolver hem2 doesn't do that when im playing is it because im on the free version how do i stop this

seriously annoying software keeps running 80%+ even when im not doing sht

Quote

11-29-2019 , 06:57 PM

#439

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,557

Uh, what are you trying to calculate? While calculations are running it's supposed to fully utilize your CPU. If you are running complex setups then you may be running against the default memory limit of 1GB. This can cause hangs but can be easily fixed by simplifying the setup or increasing the memory limit.

If this happens while no calculations are running then please give the beta version a try, let me know if anything changes:
https://www.holdemresources.net/blog...c-public-beta/

(Some users were experiencing issues with HRC if it was open while the machine was in hibernation mode for extended periods, this might be the issue here. This is fixed in the beta version.)

Quote

12-02-2019 , 01:50 AM

#440

Jay Weezey

journeyman

Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 373

Is there a way to account for a rake per hand per person type rake structure in hrc?

Quote

12-02-2019 , 04:37 AM

#441

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,557

There is a rake option for ChipEV calculations, but the rake is calculated as % of the pot with a specified cap, no flop no drop.

A fixed rake drop per hand per person wouldn't really affect the strategies anyway. (I'm assuming it isn't actually collected per hand but in regular intervals, e.g. once every orbit or whatever?)

Quote

12-07-2019 , 07:55 AM

#442

Novembersdoom

enthusiast

Join Date: Sep 2017 Posts: 54

Hi plexiq,

Please consider providing more than two flat calls / limps in the MC mode.

We can see an enormous amount of over-calls and over-limps in MTTs. I'm eager to know what range to play against several callers or limpers.

Quote

12-09-2019 , 04:30 AM

#443

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,557

We'll rewrite the betting setup and allow more than two limps / flats for MC mode, but that won't happen before the initial stable release of the current beta features. Already behind schedule on this.

Quote

12-13-2019 , 07:22 AM

#444

Pastor

grinder

Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 422

Hi Plexiq

Are there plans to support import of Party's dowloadable histories? Or are you already supporting it and I'm doing something wrong?

If you need samples I can send one.

Quote

12-13-2019 , 07:26 AM

#445

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,557

Please try to import them with the latest beta version:
https://www.holdemresources.net/blog...c-public-beta/

If it doesn't work then send me a few example HH files to support@holdemresources.net and we'll get them supported asap.

Quote

12-13-2019 , 08:29 AM

#446

Pastor

grinder

Join Date: Nov 2002 Posts: 422

Quote:

Originally Posted by plexiq

Tried it with HoldemResources Calculator 2.0.0.201911251319

Doesn't work. All other rooms including an old Party file still work fine. I've sent you one - very short.

Maybe other people can send you one or two.

Quote

12-13-2019 , 09:16 PM

#447

Atomic Blimp

stranger

Join Date: Mar 2019 Posts: 8

Hi PlexiQ,

Is it possible to run a large amount of sims using some kind of scripting functionality? Is there a way to export all results?

Quote

12-16-2019 , 09:28 AM

#448

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,557

You can run batch simulations using the "Quick Analyze" feature: first load histories via HH import, select multiple hands or tournaments and then use the yellow "Quick Analyze" button in the toolbar to run quick evaluations. You can then sort by EV to spot hands with potential mistakes and open them for more detailed analysis.

At this time there is no export option for these results.

Quote

12-30-2019 , 08:17 AM

#449

CaballoBlanco

stranger

Join Date: Dec 2019 Posts: 1

Dear Support, could you please assist with the following problem:
I try to solve a preflop spot with a 2x opening, two flatcallers and a jam.
I used the advanced hand setup, put in the betsizes and checked both boxes ("allow flating of opens" & "allow over-flatting of opens"). Once I get to the over-caller his name is marked with a small star and it does not continue when I click on his name. Is there something I am missing?
Thank you in advance!

Quote

12-30-2019 , 08:29 AM

#450

plexiq

veteran

Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 2,557

Regular calculations only support up to 3 active players, everyone else is forced to fold once 3 players enter the pot. You can use the new Monte Carlo mode in the beta version to calculate spots with more than 3 active players.

https://www.holdemresources.net/blog...c-public-beta/

Quote

Page 18 of 56

First

8 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 28 38

Last

Post Reply Subscribe

...

Page 18 of 56

First

8 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 28 38

Last