[GTO] GTO+/CardRunnersEV?
02-15-2023
, 03:56 AM
1) Left-click the range to select it
2) Select the desired colour from the popup
02-22-2023
, 12:49 AM
Sorry, let me clarify that. How do I change those particular font colors? I'd like to add a purple and yellow one and change the red to a darker one.
Last edited by AuMind; 02-22-2023 at 01:08 AM.
02-22-2023
, 03:25 AM
They can be edited directly in the file /config/settings.txt under [PREFLOP GROUP COLORS].
Or by entering any range in the matrix, clicking on "Apply groups to selection", and clicking on the "Options" icon.
See the screenshot below.
The colours are stored in RGB format.
Just google "RGB colours" for several websites that show you which code belongs to which colour.
02-22-2023
, 06:33 AM
This file can be imported into GTO+ with "File->Import .json ICM model".
HRC seems to offer many different formats for the .json file.
Ideally you should export the format "HRC Spot Export".
We support several other formats as well, but the "HRC Spot Export" is by far the most useful one, given that it contains both the ranges and ICM conversion data.
02-23-2023
, 03:19 AM
Specifically, your profiles are stored in /config/profiles.pfl.
02-25-2023
, 11:05 AM
A little mod nobody asked for 
Doing just 2 things: making RNG more visible, and restricting quiz answers to its value.
Works with GTO+ 1.5.2 x64.
https://ufile.io/l1cu815m
Doing just 2 things: making RNG more visible, and restricting quiz answers to its value.
Works with GTO+ 1.5.2 x64.
https://ufile.io/l1cu815m
02-26-2023
, 03:48 AM
Quote:
A little mod nobody asked for
Doing just 2 things: making RNG more visible, and restricting quiz answers to its value.
Works with GTO+ 1.5.2 x64.
https://ufile.io/l1cu815m
Doing just 2 things: making RNG more visible, and restricting quiz answers to its value.
Works with GTO+ 1.5.2 x64.
https://ufile.io/l1cu815m
So unfortunately I don't think we can add this.
02-27-2023
, 06:41 AM
But a mod that I absolutely needed! Nice job
Can you please clarify a couple of things for me though regarding the underlying logic used to determine correct/incorrect choices?
1. Using the image below as an example, if RNG is 15, is the "correct" answer Check because 15 is less than 17% or is the answer Bet because 15 is less than 83%?
2. How does the RNG determine the correct answer if the EV's of more than two actions are the same (within solved nash distance)?
Can you please clarify a couple of things for me though regarding the underlying logic used to determine correct/incorrect choices?
1. Using the image below as an example, if RNG is 15, is the "correct" answer Check because 15 is less than 17% or is the answer Bet because 15 is less than 83%?
2. How does the RNG determine the correct answer if the EV's of more than two actions are the same (within solved nash distance)?
02-27-2023
, 04:52 PM
Quote:
But a mod that I absolutely needed! Nice job
Can you please clarify a couple of things for me though regarding the underlying logic used to determine correct/incorrect choices?
1. Using the image below as an example, if RNG is 15, is the "correct" answer Check because 15 is less than 17% or is the answer Bet because 15 is less than 83%?
2. How does the RNG determine the correct answer if the EV's of more than two actions are the same (within solved nash distance)?
Can you please clarify a couple of things for me though regarding the underlying logic used to determine correct/incorrect choices?
1. Using the image below as an example, if RNG is 15, is the "correct" answer Check because 15 is less than 17% or is the answer Bet because 15 is less than 83%?
2. How does the RNG determine the correct answer if the EV's of more than two actions are the same (within solved nash distance)?
When doing so, this decision will be rounded to chunks of 25%, with "Check" being rounded to 75%, "Bet $124" to 25%, and the other two actions to 0%.
02-27-2023
, 11:13 PM
02-28-2023
, 03:45 AM
The EV below the table is the EV for the entire strategy.
If you mouse over this EV, then a popup will show IP's EV at this point in the hand.
02-28-2023
, 07:46 PM
Hi, I can do nodlocking only on one combo by making a pure bet, but have the solver solve the other combos in the range?.
I try to do it, but GTO+ blocks the whole line and no longer solves it, leaving it unbalanced.
Last edited by Cienfuegos; 02-28-2023 at 08:05 PM.
03-01-2023
, 05:22 AM
Not at the moment, but I can check whether we can add a sorting method for the table.
03-01-2023
, 05:27 AM
We looked into this, but the interface was just too confusing to work with. The problem is that it requires two clicks for every combos. The first click to set the desired strategy. The second click to set which combos you want to keep locked. This sounds very straightforward, but as it turns out, within a list of hundreds of combos, it's humanly impossible to keep track of which combos have been set, and which combos have been locked. It was just an enormous mess, and we decided to leave it out entirely. It's not difficult to accomplish from within the solving algorithm, but this is purely because it doesn't work from within the interface.
03-02-2023
, 04:24 AM
03-02-2023
, 01:16 PM
Quote:
But a mod that I absolutely needed! Nice job
Can you please clarify a couple of things for me though regarding the underlying logic used to determine correct/incorrect choices?
1. Using the image below as an example, if RNG is 15, is the "correct" answer Check because 15 is less than 17% or is the answer Bet because 15 is less than 83%?
2. How does the RNG determine the correct answer if the EV's of more than two actions are the same (within solved nash distance)?
Can you please clarify a couple of things for me though regarding the underlying logic used to determine correct/incorrect choices?
1. Using the image below as an example, if RNG is 15, is the "correct" answer Check because 15 is less than 17% or is the answer Bet because 15 is less than 83%?
2. How does the RNG determine the correct answer if the EV's of more than two actions are the same (within solved nash distance)?
For the 1st picture:
1-17 : Check
18 : Check or Bet16.5
19-100: Bet16.5
For the 2nd:
1-65: Check
66: Check or Bet27 or Bet62
67-68: Bet62
69: Bet62 or Bet124
70-100: Bet124
03-03-2023
, 06:55 PM
Hi Scylla,
Is there a way to run a solve with given parameters in the below table, then slightly different starting pot/effstack/rake/cap parameters? I'm asking because I've been building detailed trees for 3bet pots and then editing out the branches that don't make practical sense. I'd like to keep the actions the same while only making tweaks to these parameters instead of rebuilding the tree with slightly different parameters, then going back in and editing again.
Is there a way to run a solve with given parameters in the below table, then slightly different starting pot/effstack/rake/cap parameters? I'm asking because I've been building detailed trees for 3bet pots and then editing out the branches that don't make practical sense. I'd like to keep the actions the same while only making tweaks to these parameters instead of rebuilding the tree with slightly different parameters, then going back in and editing again.