Scy hello.. its posssible highlight more the RNG please?

Do you mean drawing it in a lighter colour?

Yes Scy, i think the colour itself is for my RGB choice on the fold, can be.. right?

Hi, when I merge 2betsizes into 1 , I cant press play vs solution, and I EV bar is dissapeared.

Ok, I will consider it for future releases.

After making edits to your tree, you'll need to solve it again under "Run solver".
After re-solving, EV and the "Play against the solution" feature will again be available.

When running a LHE sim, is there a way to force it to auto-check OOP when OOP has not previously shown aggression?

The LHE tree builder only builds trees with all possible check-bet-etc combinations for Limit Hold'em play.
In this case, you would need to use the editor to remove the unwanted bets.
Depending on what you're looking to accomplish, I imagine that this might be a bit tedious, with roughly 10 or 20 spots needing to be removed.
Due to the nature of LHE, with all trees being identical, I imagine that you could however store the tree, and use it as a template for whenever you want to use it again in the future.
Whenever you want to re-use the tree, just load the template, set any ranges/flop as you see fit, go to "Build tree->Rebuild" and click on "Rebuild with current settings".

HI, I have a question regarding the setup of trees. For the highlighted, bets, is there a way to eliminate one of the bet sizes that is very close to the other. For instance, I have bet%'s inputted, but then also have add all in bet if < 300%. With that set up I end up getting some of these situations where 2 bet sizes are too close to be used realistically, so I would want to eliminate the pre set bet % and just have the all in bet

You can use a code for this, and set a minimum gap between two bets.
For example, the code G20 will mean that when two bets are within 20% of each other, one will be removed.
See the screenshot below.

And go here for more codes: https://www.gtoplus.com/advancedcode/

Ahh, perfect. Thank you.

Hi Scy. I ran about 400 flop for my tree UTG vs Straddle. 300 completed. But now my GTO+ cannot run. Its used about 50gb ram when i open tree (i haven't run process) so it can't calculate. My CPU have 64gb ram. What;s wrong with it?

It sounds like these are very large trees, that each require roughly 200MB in both disc space and RAM.
Storing the entire database in memory would require roughly 80GB of RAM, so it won't be possible to have this entire database open with "Extensive" storage.

Upgrade to v149
I notice that you're using v144.
For the features below, please upgrade to v149.
I'm not entirely certain if they are fully available in v144.

Solving the database
It will still be possible to solve the trees in the database.
For this, export the database into its separate trees, and then solve the trees individually.
After that, merge the trees together again into a database.
Go here for more detailed instructions: https://www.gtoplus.com/processingdatabase/

Given the size of the database, you would need to split it up into two databases though.

Convert to "Basic" storage
An alternative would be to convert the database to "Basic" storage.
For this, store it with "File->Save: Convert to Basic storage".
A disadvantage would be that the extensive data on the turn would not be stored in the savefile.
Navigating to the turn would require computation, which, in trees of this size, will probably take a non-trivial amount of time.

Hi,
I want to edit some flops in the 163 subset so IP is forced to bet 100% of the time
1. is there some way to edit the tree so it solves for the first time with IP betting 100% of the time?
2. Can i keep a subset with two different types of solves (it will be the same bet sizes, but some flops will be foreced to bet 100% of the time)

Hi Scylla.

Using Gto+ again. Am running into some issues.

Have a particular range, vs another one, on a particular river runout. Have been looking at different rivers, but am noticing that the "EV", under the list of hand combos, disappears.





Hope the images aren't too large. Is there a reason why on some rivers, it displays it, but on others it doesn't ?

Thanks.

I can't immediately tell what's going on from the screenshot, but this is probably going to be some sort of exotic river effect.
Judging from the screenshot, it appears that IP only holds AA as his range.
And looking at the range vs range mini-screenshot, the range for OOP is heavily polarized.
Would it be possible for you to send a savefile to support?

I think that it would be best here to just manually go over the desired trees, and set the strategy as 100% bet.
In this manner, the trees in the database will remain identical, and aggregate data will be obtainable.
It's unfortunately not possible to mass-edit the strategy for multiple trees at the same time.

Should you want to edit all trees, in the database, then:
- Load a single tree into the editor
- Delete its "Check" action
- Accept the changes
- Build a new database from the edited tree

I love the new compact way too navigate the tree, but it gets easily overlapped with the buttons in the database and when this happens its impossible to use them, please fix this bug


All the buttons in the red line cant be clicked

Ok, thank you for pointing this out.
I'll make a note to take care of that.

Hi Scylla.

I've sent the Gto file to "help@gtoplus.com".
That's interesting. Am a bit confused, as to what that means.

Not sure if I misclicked something, but I know that on particular rivers, it displays the overall value, of the current strategy.
Still need help with this, thanks !

Ok, I have replied to your mail.

Hi scylla,

Would be nice to add range explorer feature like pio.




I know this is possible by exporting to flopzilla pro, but would be nice to have all-in-one software.

Cheers.

Something similar was added in v144.

Scy Hello!
Please remember add suited filters on the next update, please!
And the possibility to select (filter) more than one group of hands (Ex: Set+Twopairs+Fds).

oh, and i think 2bet smoothly doesnt work well... (on the turn).. can you check that?