I did that and manually typed 128GB RAM into the empty field. So the only way is to reduce the tree size? But kinda strange that a friend can solve it...with the same computer and tree setup.

It's best not to type in any artificial amount of RAM and just let GTO+ use auto-detect. So please just leave that field empty. I do notice that in your screenshots it's the rainbow flops where you're having issues. Please note that rainbow flops require more memory than 2flush, paired or mono flops. Was the "Memory needed for solving: 123 GB" pic from a rainbow flop? Because if it was for a 2flush flop, then the equivalent rainbow flops in your database will require roughly 200GB.

Hey scylla, I was able to play against the solution once, but after I was done I clicked "Stand Up" (or something like that) and I was unable to go back to "Play against the solution", as the icon is now grayed-out. Do you have to re-solve after exiting the play against solution feature or something?

It's only necessary to re-solve in the event of having edited the solution.
Is it possible that this is the case?

Hi. I have noticed the following...

we see BU vs BB. I was testing if BB is donking but thats not i am asking for. Pic1 showsBB and all % for each action (check, betx%, betx%, betx%). Pic2 the more important one is showing nothing. Why i cant see action % for BU?


https://gyazo.com/6494ae36ae110202a6cd42ce265cb19c

https://gyazo.com/5a66ad6971128b06c7b651e40574ec39

Play against the solution feature is absolutely awesome. I do wish you would put out more training videos though as the software is intimidating if your new to solvers.

If OOP has multiple actions, then there will also be multiple spots where IP gets to act. So for example, if OOP either bets or checks then IP's actions would need to be displayed separately for each scenario by OOP. And each data point will have been measured for a different range and frequency for OOP. This means that this data for IP is essentially not suitable for being displayed in a table/graph. We can decide to ignore this, and plot it anyhow for later releases, but right at this moment it has been left out for this reason.

Can GTO+ make use of hyper threading? I’m looking to build a new PC and choosing a CPU. Is the i7-6700k suitable for fast solves?

Yes, GTO+ can use as many threads as you like. Typically 2x the number of physical cores will give you optimal performance. I can not give any guarantees regarding specific processors, but 4x4gHz should be sufficient for any regular purposes.

Why are the equity distribution graphs in FlopZillaPro different from HoldEq? I like HoldEq as you can see hands from both ranges at the same time and it is celar in what % of range you are. In FlopZilla you have to switch between ranges and the % is not celar. Or am I missing something?

It's just a different approach.
We can consider modifying it for FlopzillaPro, but right at this moment this is how it works.

Hey guys, what am i doing wrong. I have this settings for a limpot in a HU sng.
but im getting really weird results, like really different frequencies compared to PIO

https://gyazo.com/07b834d2389274495aa4a1acd4c889e0

Hi!
So what should my stack size be, if i´m in a 4 bet pot 50bb in the middle and the starting stack is 100bb? Do i write 100bb in the effective stacks box or 75bb?

75

Sent from my ONEPLUS A3003 using Tapatalk

Our advanced tree builder is not exactly the same as pio's, so it's possible for the results to be different. Our "Basic" tree builder is the same as their "v1" tree builder though; when comparing with those, and thus having exactly the same trees, you'll get nearly the same results. That being said, I notice that you're using multiple bet sizes. In GTO the EVs of all bet sizes will perform very closely to one another (within 1%). As a result, within any given dEV, many different configurations for the betting frequencies are possible. In the end, all the bet sizes perform approximately the same, so you're basically looking at static; or in other words, it's mostly a coincidence which bet size is used most frequenly. I would expect the bet vs check frequency to be similar though.

The starting stack was 100bb, but you have put in 25bb at this point.
So 75bb.

Thank you Scylla!

Is there any way for me to view IP flop betting frequencies in a list of flops as the PFR? Sort of how PIO solver does it when you export?

Hello, I downloaded version 1.2.6 and when I try to open my older sims it says "Unexpected file format". Are all my old sims gone now?

Let me take a look at this tomorrow and get back to you.

No, we'll figure it out.

If OOP has multiple actions, then there will also be multiple spots where IP gets to act. So for example, if OOP either bets or checks then IP's actions would need to be displayed separately for each scenario by OOP. And each data point will have been measured for a different range and frequency for OOP. This means that this data for IP is essentially not suitable for being displayed in a table/graph. We can decide to ignore this, and plot it anyhow for later releases, but right at this moment it has been left out for this reason.

Hi, after the update I can not process gto files from a given directory. It doesn't detect them.

I'd like to repurpose some pio sims into GTO+. Is there a way to import saved tree parameters directly? Any plans to make this possible?

We don't offer such an option. We could consider it, but in the long run it can be very difficult to support third party products.

I've just tested, and it works over here.
Can you try a simple directory, such as C:/tmp?