Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? GTO+/CardRunnersEV?

10-17-2022 , 09:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mamaMarilyn
does it matter that much if the cpu can be overclocked or not?
Overclocking will give higher performance, although on some systems it seems to lead to unstable performance.
I don't know whether or not this is a common occurrence; overclocking has always seemed to work perfectly fine on all systems that I've ever tested on.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-17-2022 , 09:11 AM
i see, that makes a lot of sense

one last thing, do you have any spec recommendations?
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-17-2022 , 11:14 AM
i think im gonna go with ryzen5 6 cores/12 threads + 16gb RAM, will that be good enough for almost all realistic postflop spots?
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-17-2022 , 01:44 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by mamaMarilyn
i think im gonna go with ryzen5 6 cores/12 threads + 16gb RAM, will that be good enough for almost all realistic postflop spots?
In my personal opinion a 6 core CPU should lead to perfectly satisfactory performance, although this is of course subjective.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-18-2022 , 04:25 AM
Turn hand strat overlaps river sizings %.


Last edited by Alexx_Bk; 10-18-2022 at 04:53 AM.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-18-2022 , 05:02 AM
There is also an overlap when you have 3+ sizings and hover over the combo.

GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-18-2022 , 06:29 AM
Could you add the ability to display a "backdoor straight draw" at the settings. And "backdoor street + backdoor fd."
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-18-2022 , 08:45 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asaf91
Could you add the ability to display a "backdoor straight draw" at the settings. And "backdoor street + backdoor fd."
I can consider adding it for future releases.
A problem there though is that nearly every hand is a backdoor straight draw.
For example, T9 on a 832 board is a backdoor straight draw, but so is 73 on a JT2 board.
So it's a really thin draw, that applies to most hands.

Last edited by scylla; 10-18-2022 at 08:51 AM.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-18-2022 , 08:47 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexx_Bk
Turn hand strat overlaps river sizings %.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alexx_Bk
There is also an overlap when you have 3+ sizings and hover over the combo.
Can you try using the new "Compact" tree navigator?
You may need to upgrade to the latest version, given that this feature is a fairly recent addition.

GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-18-2022 , 07:10 PM
Hey Scylla, I'm currently trying to run some 111 flops database sims for SRPs BTN vs BB with multiple sizes. The problem is the trees I use typically run out of memory on certain flops in the database. I keep trimming it down, but unfortunately the problem flops come up more than halfway through the db. I'm thus wondering if it's possible to alter the trees for certain flops? For instance, I've made some mods to the tree now, but 47 flops in I don't want to have to recalculate all of these and would rather just have the old tree.

What would be the easiest way to do this (if possible)? Should I make a new db file, update the trees, export the flops, delete the ones that are already solved, and then merge all of them with the original db file?
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-19-2022 , 02:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bolognie1
Hey Scylla, I'm currently trying to run some 111 flops database sims for SRPs BTN vs BB with multiple sizes. The problem is the trees I use typically run out of memory on certain flops in the database. I keep trimming it down, but unfortunately the problem flops come up more than halfway through the db. I'm thus wondering if it's possible to alter the trees for certain flops? For instance, I've made some mods to the tree now, but 47 flops in I don't want to have to recalculate all of these and would rather just have the old tree.

What would be the easiest way to do this (if possible)? Should I make a new db file, update the trees, export the flops, delete the ones that are already solved, and then merge all of them with the original db file?
A database can indeed require a substantial amount of RAM if "Extensive" storage is used.
To get around this, you can export the database into its separate trees, solve those trees, and then merge the trees together again into a database.
Go here for instructions: https://www.gtoplus.com/processingdatabase/
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-19-2022 , 04:38 AM
Hi Scylla, I'm just having a discussion about the max-exploit capabilities of GTO+. In CREV there was a possibility to calculate a max-exploit strategy and in GTO+ there is not. My assumption is that if we do node locking on our opponent then the calculated GTO solution will be equal to the max-exploit solution, is this true? For example, in my experience, the GTO solution will bet any2 if the opponent overfolds in a spot.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-19-2022 , 07:28 AM
https://jumbomail.me/j/3YYYW5a_A0yr9O_


If you go to the "Edit tree" tab in this file and try to delete size 35. GTO+ crashes.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-19-2022 , 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenji
Hi Scylla, I'm just having a discussion about the max-exploit capabilities of GTO+. In CREV there was a possibility to calculate a max-exploit strategy and in GTO+ there is not. My assumption is that if we do node locking on our opponent then the calculated GTO solution will be equal to the max-exploit solution, is this true? For example, in my experience, the GTO solution will bet any2 if the opponent overfolds in a spot.
It's not possible to gain EV by performing max exploit on a perfect GTO solution.
So, when performing max exploit, the GTO solution would simply be one of the possible outcomes.

Last edited by scylla; 10-19-2022 at 09:48 AM.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-19-2022 , 09:35 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asaf91
https://jumbomail.me/j/3YYYW5a_A0yr9O_
If you go to the "Edit tree" tab in this file and try to delete size 35. GTO+ crashes.
Ok, thank you.
I have fixed this for v148.
For the moment, in your savefile, if you load the tree with "IMPORT TREE" and edit it, it won't crash after clicking "ACCEPT CHANGES".
The problem is just with an internal setting in the tree that is currently active in the editor.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-19-2022 , 11:00 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scylla
It's not possible to gain EV by performing max exploit on a perfect GTO solution.
So, when performing max exploit, the GTO solution would simply be one of the possible outcomes.
I mean when we use the node lock option and make one player deviate from the GTO solution, e.g. let him overfold in a certain spot such that the other player has auto-profit when he bets with whatever holding. If we then resolve, the newly calculated GTO solution corresponds to the max exploit strategy for the player whose node is not locked, am I right?
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-19-2022 , 04:04 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kenji
I mean when we use the node lock option and make one player deviate from the GTO solution, e.g. let him overfold in a certain spot such that the other player has auto-profit when he bets with whatever holding. If we then resolve, the newly calculated GTO solution corresponds to the max exploit strategy for the player whose node is not locked, am I right?
Yes, provided that you have locked all of villain's decisions, including all play on the turn and river for all possible board runouts.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-19-2022 , 06:54 PM
Hi Scylla,

i´m playing around with the icm feature, but i´m not sure if it works right or if i did any mistake at some point... Maybe someone can tell me if this solver output makes sense?

setup:


Flop play:

IP (shorter stack) overbets 100%



OOP folds 0%



Turn play:

OOP donks 100%



IP Calls 100%

This can´t be a good solution. Did i make a mistake at any point?
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-20-2022 , 02:11 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by JimPanse
Hi Scylla,
i´m playing around with the icm feature, but i´m not sure if it works right or if i did any mistake at some point... Maybe someone can tell me if this solver output makes sense?
setup:

Flop play:
IP (shorter stack) overbets 100%

OOP folds 0%

Turn play:
OOP donks 100%

IP Calls 100%
This can´t be a good solution. Did i make a mistake at any point?
Can you send a savefile to support?
I can't really tell from the screenshots.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-22-2022 , 07:38 AM
Hi, scylla!

Got weird ev graph


It is normal, if i recalculate the same tree with 0% (ai) branch removed. Is it bug or not?

Also, it is not possible to reopen already opened file to discard changes, nothing happens. Expected behavior: program warns about changes made, then refresh session from disk.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-22-2022 , 10:43 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by _player_
Hi, scylla!
Got weird ev graph

It is normal, if i recalculate the same tree with 0% (ai) branch removed. Is it bug or not?
That shouldn't happen, but I see where the problem is.
It's related to a new feature in v147.
Today is my day off, but I'll post a fix tomorrow.

Quote:
Originally Posted by _player_
Also, it is not possible to reopen already opened file to discard changes, nothing happens. Expected behavior: program warns about changes made, then refresh session from disk.
This is not on our end, but a property of Windows.
When you have a file open, it's not possible to open that file again.
This applies to us, and any other program.
For example, Word and Excel have this property as well.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-22-2022 , 12:36 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scylla
That shouldn't happen, but I see where the problem is.
It's related to a new feature in v147.
Today is my day off, but I'll post a fix tomorrow.
Good news!

Quote:
Originally Posted by scylla
This is not on our end, but a property of Windows.
When you have a file open, it's not possible to open that file again.
This applies to us, and any other program.
For example, Word and Excel have this property as well.
Hmm... Not exactly! Word, Excel, then they open different file, do it in separate window. In turn, GTO+ has "replace current info" open semantics, like notepad.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-23-2022 , 02:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by _player_
Good news!
Hmm... Not exactly! Word, Excel, then they open different file, do it in separate window. In turn, GTO+ has "replace current info" open semantics, like notepad.
On my own systems, when using Word/Excel/other, when I:
1) Open a savefile
2) Make some changes
3) Open the same savefile again
nothing will happen; the savefile will not be loaded.
Are you perhaps referring to some other method for opening a file?

Last edited by scylla; 10-23-2022 at 02:13 AM.
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-23-2022 , 04:05 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by scylla
On my own systems, when using Word/Excel/other, when I:
1) Open a savefile
2) Make some changes
3) Open the same savefile again
nothing will happen; the savefile will not be loaded.
Are you perhaps referring to some other method for opening a file?
But if you in step 3 open OTHER file, it will not harm current changed data, separate window will be opened. This way in Word/Excel you never expect "Open" function to affect current data.
In GTO+ if you open OTHER file - it closes current edit session. Thus i expect it will do so with the same file too. Like in notepad.exe
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote
10-23-2022 , 08:42 AM
Hi Scylla,

I encountered some weird stuff with the tree builder:

I have in the code field B1MG15 if that matters.

First I built a tree with no flop donk (0) and 25,50,100,200 sizes for all positions for betting and 3,5x for raising.
It worked out all good, I got my tree. Then I just modified the flop bet to g3, worked well too, but when I try to modify anything in the turn or river betting sizes it always stays the same (25,50,100,200). I even completely restarted gtoplus but I still got the same sizes for turn and river. I can still change the flopsizes the way I want, but just the flop. What could be the problem?
Thanks!
GTO+/CardRunnersEV? Quote

      
m