[GTO] GTO+/CardRunnersEV?
02-16-2017
, 09:28 PM
02-17-2017
, 05:41 AM
I think the easiest workaround here will be to accept input if ENTER is pressed.
From what I can tell, that should get us around the issue.
Should I have overlooked something, then please let me know.
Cheers,
Scylla
Last edited by scylla; 02-17-2017 at 05:46 AM.
02-18-2017
, 05:49 AM
02-20-2017
, 05:51 AM
Quote:
Hi Scylla,
I have a maybe stupid question. If I want to edit(node lock) a range at the turn or river,
I am not able to run the equilibrium tool again. It sais "Unable to find entry point for the last board phase" How does it work at the turn or river, if i want to change a range and run the solver again?
Regards
Zoty
I have a maybe stupid question. If I want to edit(node lock) a range at the turn or river,
I am not able to run the equilibrium tool again. It sais "Unable to find entry point for the last board phase" How does it work at the turn or river, if i want to change a range and run the solver again?
Regards
Zoty
02-20-2017
, 05:59 AM
See the savefile below for an example.
You can import this savefile by pressing Ctrl+I.
Code:
[CardRunnersEV v3.3.3] [This text block contains a savefile for CardRunnersEV] [Use Ctrl+I to import into CardRunnersEV] [www.cardrunnersev.com] [lKkiT#DEd?U-!1MA4enC5TOUiwTJ1L1MT@iwmj?Kfy1pgOt@vgDUj0c_.0TEZj9Pf+#fo6] [+xaxkW9#=2#*(UhO!e)P4z=B3dwW*4erTmO_2X=9J*w42&sqe.b?MBO0UU$byTMNch2_lG] [hgKMn-7Dj2Xf0S.91SkoXD9PqJtq#LY$MmM!15KVHHSfnL$-Jv#wh8yc55wP0bsdTv6@tm] [#A?krX&AhrK+0!6Ul@BJd#0BVK!i6U2mKv1F4jC7Y$G3&LMNfvIbRzvWP!vl$cA_oP-Z.z] [$wJMWSvRhY6DHDVfPbLuCgx9IFGW&rTJ3-6xQZ#j+#TboE-m7@&&Jd!QEA487erqwIlJIt] [GjC#w7Xa+_Rfkpro_-u0nHM2c#fPgAj7WTp.YK4ISofLo770Ya-!Wl!7eGio-XxhU2T&$&] [d6!jmE-dXTH7+p5&g+#jmXK2hAXFch+3k+v2TYNR$@Cg+EQtK@dXVbPh1q!NNR?BW8EXtH] [SbZvY4CCKXcUkCoZ5LKRc$be3!@Pj2mUzxLkKrN7uVFSR6#Q5jV+fr1x&11e&S5SKZx.OM] [WvF4jVF-+@Fz@gOkE0bMI7pFrUxJ1-diu3NRhoSr9V1FvcnTpPVa!+cCJ2xhc1GfDPX7N@] [xj4tEWuuCG9R1xhu_7Es65OEmSDDlB8y$YsV--zPn5xNjx+kR0NCLffA1Lu-&kwNdvM.d1] [z6s9RU3o-3EZ1ICL#sVkeEADdh76l0Qikgx&Z#@B5i6!L1jsT8e3_Z4x_KcItfhWfZlBXd] [TYIWVTnFT@0tT78h?B@$zvImv0F$_D?VMlMO7Ss.1cZ+7E#&.GJO0FZLn5eOCyyrXxop$#] [bbtdh_b$D@aP1KuPGJojzBoI-kWuOPM43I0sR3gk8.MPBzTz93vT-eeB?MLKVK2XGr5$W$] [Z166tG$qk]
Should you want to select gutshot+highcard with the analysis tool, then this is possible as well. For this, right-click "no made hand" to fix it and only show highcards. After that, you can select the gutshots in the "gutshot" stat.
PS:
It appears I made the savefile with v333.
See the next post for a download link.
02-20-2017
, 06:03 AM
02-21-2017
, 05:25 PM
02-21-2017
, 08:35 PM
02-22-2017
, 05:46 AM
02-22-2017
, 08:36 AM
^ I've mailed it
Also, another question. I'd like to mod your software i.e. make a night mode. I found the files in the proper folder and modify them. The problem is with the fonts that are barely visible. Can we do something about it? Or do you tought about a night mode?
Also, another question. I'd like to mod your software i.e. make a night mode. I found the files in the proper folder and modify them. The problem is with the fonts that are barely visible. Can we do something about it? Or do you tought about a night mode?
02-23-2017
, 05:53 AM
Quote:
^ I've mailed it
Also, another question. I'd like to mod your software i.e. make a night mode. I found the files in the proper folder and modify them. The problem is with the fonts that are barely visible. Can we do something about it? Or do you tought about a night mode?
Also, another question. I'd like to mod your software i.e. make a night mode. I found the files in the proper folder and modify them. The problem is with the fonts that are barely visible. Can we do something about it? Or do you tought about a night mode?
Thank you for the feedback,
Scylla
02-24-2017
, 07:40 AM
Quote:
Hi,
I have set up a spot where BTN and SB are shortstacks (5bb).
BTN shoves, SB calls, and I was wondering which hands were +EV calls.
So I set it up in CREV :
So when my mouse goes on the "call" action for BB, in the pop up window, I can see the EV for calling with each one of my combos, right?
How can it be more +EV to call with AKo (3.7) than with AKs (1.98)?
and also : A9o > A9s, A7o > A7s
I thought this was due to combo removal, but for example, there very few 7x combos in Villain's ranges, so I don't get it. And such a difference between AKs and AKo...
I have set up a spot where BTN and SB are shortstacks (5bb).
BTN shoves, SB calls, and I was wondering which hands were +EV calls.
So I set it up in CREV :
Code:
[CardRunnersEV v3.3.0] [This text block contains a savefile for CardRunnersEV] [Use Ctrl+I to import into CardRunnersEV] [www.cardrunnersev.com] [-PJ#3JkLG9_1iKvSalzwS5F?&aHEXx4dc#I7Hi-cfYOo.z#q5s4kYGmzg&gxoxxW-bs.rx] [RTQFMl_=mI*(&qf#-)!Tl=!mFt&*-3qK@l7+-=uu*-b.tSg.5dcIO53WQ0ocXfQ8SIiDYc] [XH?Q6gQL9LM9aeC50hm$&rZ.dHK&bO0-6w2CrZod-d5XU-6..m739PP9QH?NtmK2?$Dm9!] [GC2D8Ba!@B@.uhpPsouPGMd!V.3nyLc!o9mmbf30!QszaM$NwwfiKzrXri1su81z3J2GrN] [1yMZQhmg-WwkagDy#2+TKeil7KnI!c!A.4k2mdqgR1C5TkMkBUAqjGlZusD82N&yM6-f#q] [yZzg5QqZxQaTFi_UVYTRTA-zS?_!@#XDh.$3!C6ZfIC7QF#9pB&fp82+SmUOTO1-5qFfQF] [q_psV22TtlFoJtRzIxzAl7#GMey-S?pa9!.+Gw&#V_D&W3m&SYLeG+#!Hewfe#QFI.ZMI7] [#cvVoRbHPU1MwrCOkqgNoj3QxsDJf_?PMZrzr#vq!xnxG4PSYJdh1lX@0ev2t@g6V72iix] [lGDlZx&KyOm@&bhij9CjEbZ2bIa5-iImsjruPHKXV3$N_RX#h+-yX2.yASIjgv#dzJuCmz] [qB2L.r869It1RHNPs&CVJF55?slde3-STnepRAWP$Gx4kZihPLZe.EaBs6L0ltFTVDj49.] [10?a6Bs+dJ1O9jM707js6Y-s_W9Bk_+X@1ke@Y4-$_+Z.@SZhZtSqaok-wphT#hV$smm-h] [QwSLZR9Ui$_L43LjA5V-!sTHDw?yh5Gtfi?l!@5HAL#$O9pv8hNZw?ffNeiNIE9xCEp9&F] [mu86obk$aXEvDGDF#GT.#dQ5yxIzK3O1ukr+888wEv88XcbRR4rnNnrgy&CdAYDlOMamyh] [bwQOYveaUPa9Ff8Et7LR2YCnM?32vsxN.sJ684DB+H3Z#mHDf+XpC?o_AZc1.M2FZ37ugf] [!re1m?_epIj-X1kr!v+eOG_RLtYOrvemlC8SAy&B!T8!?aJiRPIMQA4wn4csjRTkKqEpjQ] [5u5JZQ$k&iE!QqcFM988OfkxV30pDD7_Txc39csR9it9GWHNv3YNw&bOV7h-8&+Lj617Zf] [p$y&P-Nkd6w+FnoyWmfE4wFn?NyvWO$Ekxz&XR7dBB4ZwLCQ5g7qk7&nuex62B1kCMNX1R] [6eQoz0z_ZVGkWHbGL1nBZKF@,wA0osL$r,CFKOMo&&pviv9nggGGcNi.7MI1O9WQ+_R!fB] [hPPOvhCMB55-O#e&3lUD.IySppf.ZI!D+fesH#TtPqlY+5T7QlLv954aT$KgJ&+.SJYwEh] [NStaYSMIeoGb6Pja@iSdQ+cvgh$INP@C.V&TjDzCbl4FqX+aGHT9XLz+bxbh0H$i6&qpd@] [7?B$lQ@fAYm+k+XNQzXG7N1YKop88U1gV&4H#ay8KumwWM_nUSiEo+dQf2dZwBW6em7l.7] [sg?o8Wfrf4EKoPR24gVTIRtemm$ylyDlrOvMUL&!g3nHI1,@LeAVMft,VGhxAHj9@Nj4kV] [zPIHxXdabqz1e@tlHX3YX-63+lbLy7po&!BCgRCq9eW00Sa7bl.Q4ljwJu-B-Oe?UCYKqE] [fDwh@!v$z_AiWWVCkCZw4K7tdAk0&d+BlGiWUs_+!FUHU5+@zb4FSYJF6b!Ux4Z.AlawgX] [FV2e7heclWxczhctu.J0N0aaMvlOCnY2qSkR4pr@NUSf1h8cQREX!vZLpfuxCg&Q5LD448] [hS2RphbR`NQ`+vw-KDZu#rCkMVVGN$PCDNG3Nj+qcDkR1AHiYC?Oy8iaq$9G$21aC.myCg] [hXwNxJCL.4v8K77Y?jSrlgFuy7g88eQiU7nYo!jTs_CV#i06ksXTtxtgsiR&K838WDHCsY] [3gTI-zCPgBGmb0KDKk0liT3Rlv1X?#qKPKxhpFVDtlQ?8ZuJ8Q-A+&1IVrLdj7xQHyk@pJ] [L#4oIBUlm-JXOAhMJfZtl4joY&6!U?@e6iP3sFQ@rcTj!aQN67aohbIQqVbNOZOstODGA3] [&gJHr55MnS_O#E9LLpjk9SIttKW3WXjjd$5juD4_w6e+?kBWe8H?Yq?XFq3g+CVNFH.#l#] [e97agAOhuSSvgjmJh4HezNP-R4w2Jy8MVD?dGAj]
How can it be more +EV to call with AKo (3.7) than with AKs (1.98)?
and also : A9o > A9s, A7o > A7s
I thought this was due to combo removal, but for example, there very few 7x combos in Villain's ranges, so I don't get it. And such a difference between AKs and AKo...
In order to increase the number of simulations that reach BB I have removed all fold actions. Now all simulations reach him. On top of that, I have increased the total number of simulations. See below for a pic with the performance of the individual combos after doing this:
That being said, when using Monte Carlo, all results will always have an error in them. So it may take some effort to get a clear picture for individual combos. A big advantage on the other hand of the Monte Carlo engine is that it will always work, even for multiple players or unknown boards.
Quote:
PS : Scylla, as you are in the maths and algorithms, another question : If we have a decent estimation of what our equity is vs BTN range, and a decent estimation of what our equity is vs SB range, is there any trick to make a decent estimation of our equity in this 3 way pot? Or any simple formula?
I have started a thread about this question here : http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/15.../#post51765945
I have started a thread about this question here : http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/15.../#post51765945
02-24-2017
, 08:06 AM
Quote:
When using monte carlo, you will need a sufficient number of simulations for the results to converge. In particular, if you want the results for individual combos to converge, then each combo will need sufficient simulations as well.
In order to increase the number of simulations that reach BB I have removed all fold actions. Now all simulations reach him. On top of that, I have increased the total number of simulations. See below for a pic with the performance of the individual combos after doing this:
That being said, when using Monte Carlo, all results will always have an error in them. So it may take some effort to get a clear picture for individual combos. A big advantage on the other hand of the Monte Carlo engine is that it will always work, even for multiple players or unknown boards.
No, there's no such trick that I'm aware of. There's too many factors involved to make a reliable estimation. It's most likely not too difficult to come up with many scenarios where you have equity X versus player 1 and equity Y versus player 2, but with a different equity versus both.
In order to increase the number of simulations that reach BB I have removed all fold actions. Now all simulations reach him. On top of that, I have increased the total number of simulations. See below for a pic with the performance of the individual combos after doing this:
That being said, when using Monte Carlo, all results will always have an error in them. So it may take some effort to get a clear picture for individual combos. A big advantage on the other hand of the Monte Carlo engine is that it will always work, even for multiple players or unknown boards.
No, there's no such trick that I'm aware of. There's too many factors involved to make a reliable estimation. It's most likely not too difficult to come up with many scenarios where you have equity X versus player 1 and equity Y versus player 2, but with a different equity versus both.
I just read on your website :
There's two situations where the math engine can't be used:
- There's more than two active players in the hand
So I guess I can't use math engine here, right?
So in fact, these results I mentioned are not accurate?
I should increase the number of simulations I guess? What number do you recommend?
02-25-2017
, 07:33 AM