Open Side Menu Go to the Top

01-27-2011 , 09:03 PM
Okay so Wamy is off this week, so I've put up an interesting and kind of fun one pocket situation as this week's problem...



The situation is that yours is pocket 'A' in the upper left. You currently need two balls and your opponent needs three. You have workable shots on either the one ball or the nine ball, but both are fraught with danger if you miss, as the three ball being very close to dead into your opponent's hole off the two. However they're also lying in such away that it's hard to do anything with them if you choose to duck. For argument's sake let's assume you're both decent players and are playing for decent money.

So with that in mind, what is the best shot?

1) If you would play an offensive shot, which one?

2) If you play safe, where would you duck and why? What are you trying to accomplish?

Solution

Spoiler:

First of all it's worth noting that I got this problem from Grady Matthews, just to give credit where due.

So there were some interesting solutions put forth, most of which focused on shooting at either the nine ball or the one ball, which are both decent enough shots but in my opinion are both flawed in that they fail to take into account the score, which is always vitally important in all end-game situation. In one pocket, in fact in all pool games, you should never shoot a shot that you can LOSE with, that you can't WIN with, and as the table lies that's exactly what an offensive shot on the one or nine is. Even if you make one of them you can't get at that third ball you need to win the game.

As such what can you do? Obviously you can play safe off the nine, but that really doesn't gain very much. Instead, let's think outside the box. Why not just shoot the two ball straight in and stop the white?



We're all familiar with the fact that when an opponent hangs up a ball by his hole you can play a sacrifice by pocketing it yourself, however there's no hard and fast rule that you have to wait until then to do it! In this situation if you simply pocket the two ball and freeze him to the high side of the three, there's virtually nowhere that he can play a shot where you're not going to have a shot to win the game the very next time you come to the table. And all it cost you was a ball. It would be a bargain at twice the price.

Last edited by RayPowers; 02-04-2011 at 09:11 AM. Reason: Changed as per dino's request
Problem of the week 24
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
Problem of the week 24
01-28-2011 , 06:29 PM
i don't really play one pocket but i can't look past playing the 9 fairly slowly half-ball or so to send it towards our pocket. playing a pot from this position seems suicidal
01-30-2011 , 07:59 AM
It's hard to tell if it is on from the diagram, but depending on the exact angle I probably play the same shot in both situations. Clip the one down the rail with a ton of left hand English/screw to bring the cue ball down towards our opponent's pocket. Even if missed leaves a ball over our pocket and the cue ball safe, and if we get it we should have a nice angle on the nine to sink it and send the cue ball up to break the two and three up and hopefully leave us at least a table bank if not better to win the game at that visit.
01-31-2011 , 01:11 AM
1. I prefer this shot to the 1 because I have more of the cueball to work with.




2. Not sure if its on but I like this, will take some pace to go 2 rails on the 3 and with the one looking to be frozen I don't think I sell out the bank.

01-31-2011 , 02:20 PM
I would play the 1ball with as much left as i can , pocket speed , trying to play shape on the bottom left part of the table (as you look at the diagram) for the 9ball in pocket "A"...
01-31-2011 , 04:46 PM
[QUOTE=Cueball;24504697]1. I prefer this shot to the 1 because I have more of the cueball to work with.




2. Not sure if its on but I like this, will take some pace to go 2 rails on the 3 and with the one looking to be frozen I don't think I sell out the bank.




Fixed some bugged links, I hope.
01-31-2011 , 05:44 PM
I really like cueball 2nd shot.
01-31-2011 , 06:09 PM
Think first one of cueballs is bad imo because of the fact it leaves a possible shot at the three with no real benefit other than just striking the cue ball a bit better - risk reward just seems off here. Second shot is a great option though imo - might even be able to treble the 3 into our pocket as well as get the 2 over it if we judge it well.
02-04-2011 , 09:11 AM
Bump for solution added.
02-04-2011 , 01:16 PM
Yeah very slick dino (and Mr Matthews) - great solution.
02-04-2011 , 05:49 PM
that's a very clever answer that i never considered, nice
02-04-2011 , 07:13 PM
nice solution.
Problem of the week 24
$25m Guaranteed WPM on CoinPoker
Join the action now
Daily Rewards • Splash Pots • CoinRaces
Problem of the week 24

      
m