One of the biggest disappointments of the show thus far has been how little meaningful observations of human action and interaction in the post-apoc world there has been. It's an obvious point to many, but I'll repeat it anyway: the main point of zombie movies in many ways is not the zombies (like someone pointed out before they are just an awesome, insane variable to end human civilization and bring constant fear, unpredictability and tension to the survivors), but the surviving humans and how they interact. A good, serious zombie show, which is what I feel this show is trying to be at times, should constantly be exploring Thomas Hobbes' famous assertion that life without civilization is "nasty, brutish and short", whether that is correct, or whether there is hope for a meaningful and productive existence with other human beings. There should be constant exploration of moral ambiguity, utilitarianism vs rights based morality, explorations of loneliness, suicide, exploring how and why human beings prey on each other, whether there is space for hope and so on and so on.
Obviously many of these themes have been explored to a certain extent, but the problem is that this exploration is just so superficial and shallow. They never push the envelope. Aspects of the show which have become a joke at this point, the Shane vs Daleface moral issues for example, could have been excellent, exciting and really thought provoking. If the writers had written this conflict better, given the characters proper motivations, and not had them constantly making ******ed decisions (not to mention the acting), then this could have been a great, great show which actually had something important to say. At the very least, it would have been much more interesting and watchable. There is such potential in this story for a really ****ing smart, interesting, and slick show, but it's just not executed, for many reasons already noted in this thread over and over.
One of the worst things is I don't know whether this is a conscious or unconscious decision on the part of the writers. Given they are smart people, the fact that the germs of a really fantastic show are in there, that they must have people around them to tell them all the dumb **** they're doing, and given the fact that there are so many criticisms which are obvious even to a child, I feel like it can't be an unconscious decision. Which leaves a conscious decision to appeal to the lowest form of tv fan. The way I see it is, they could make a really, really great show with not that much more effort that would appeal to smart, educated tv watchers who have a decent attention span. It could have all those interesting aspects, while also being hugely exciting and full of gore.
Instead, I picture them sitting round the table, picturing the typical fan that they are writing for, and it being this guy:
Which means they neglect all the important stuff, and just seek to fill the show with explosions, absurd plot-lines, a complete lack of logic or realism, crappy cliff-hangers, nonsensical dialogue etc etc.
Last edited by Not_In_My_Name; 03-26-2012 at 04:06 PM.