Quote:
Originally Posted by Alrighty Roo
He's still at Fox, doing something else. Sounds like a demotion.
I think I read that exact quote on TV by the Numbers, and it definitely sounds like a demotion, albeit a good one.
Quote:
Originally Posted by master3004
This is wrong imo, I put Roseanne right behind Seinfeld for best Sitcom of the 90's, with Married a spot or two behind.
Plus Roseanne in the Peg role doesn't work as well as Katey Segal.
It's possible you could be right about the 90s, but both shows started in the 80s, and the 80s years of Married...with Children (the Steve years mostly) were outstanding, and far better, to me, than the 80s Roseanne.
So, I would agree that 90s Roseanne (can't remember how far I got on that show as it crossed part of my college years where I didn't have a TV) was better than 90s Married...with Children, which became really caricatured in its later years. I don't think there's any chance 80s Roseanne was better than the Steve years of Married...with Children, though.
Roseanne would not have worked as Peg Bundy, unless Al was cast completely differently. She was really good with John Goodman, though. Katey Sagal and Ed O'Neill are iconic as Peg and Al, and if it hadn't been them, it might not have made it. FOX had a lot of neat sitcoms in that era that didn't make it for one reason or another, and that's really why Married...with Children stood apart (in addition to the rather biting social commentary that I even wrote a college paper about in college).