Quote:
Originally Posted by fraleyight
All I said is its completely consistent with the evidence to say he drove her around the wooded area behind his trailer in her car.
Meaning, in the absence of evidence 'anything could have happened'.
Quote:
Its equally as speculative to say he "stayed home" you have no evidence of this.
Other than all the witnesses trotted out saying they saw Steven at home throughout the afternoon and evening which was claimed as evidence Steven 'must have' killed Teresa and burned her body in his yard.
Just another case of conflicting, mutually exclusive stories trotted out by people whose only unswerving dogma is that Steven somehow, someway killed Teresa - and it doesn't matter how, or when, or why.
Quote:
I think there is better evidence but I think they are more or less reliable.
I'm inclined to think the dogs are reliable, as they aren't going to be worried about being caught up in a wrongful conviction lawsuit.
No. Why do you ask?
Quote:
There are not "multiple" explanations for this crime. There are multiple explanations for why a dog would pick up her scent where he did.
Well, one major 'alternative theory' is that Steven alone committed a crime, then next week it's a conspiracy. One day it's Steven stayed at home, then it's he drove he to another location. One day it's strangling, then it's stabbing, then it's shooting.
What next? Fired from a cannon? Dropped from a helicopter? Chopped into pieces with a laser? Could be. It's consistent with the facts.
Quote:
Ive been pretty clear on my point here. The video of me killing someone is enough to convict me. It doesn't matter if I did it at 9pm or at 9am. It doesn't matter if I did it in my back yard or in my neighbors yard. We have a video of me killing someone.
None of which has anything to do with the maybe/possibly/perhaps/woulda/coulda/shoulda theory being handwaved at us by the prosecution and its fanbois.
Quote:
The evidence that steven killed Teresa is enough to convict him.
Yes, and the evidence that Steven raped that woman he didn't rape was enough to convict him in 1985. Securing a conviction doesn't mean much when you give it a moment's sober reflection.
Quote:
It doesn't matter if he drove her around, if someone else did like Brendan, if he carried her around on his back, if she tried to drive away and he followed her etc... None of that matters. We have an insurmountable mountain of evidence that points to his involvement in her death.
I get it. There is no evidence that would convince you that Steven Avery is innocent. Even if I had a video showing Ken Kratz doing it in the torture chamber he installed in his $350K house.