Oh not who I thought. Thanks.

I remember the R+L=J guy as well but can't think of the name. I think he had a lot of posts though and some people in here defended him saying he was just good at watching tv lol

Our house I think. Something along those lines.

Wasnt it doggz, gobbo's buddy?

Doggz has 100% not read the books and has never read any spoilers.

Edit: And he won't let me tell him any theories either.

My irl friend guessed R+L=J after season 1.

I seem to remember after the Purple Wedding episode someone came into the TV only thread with a bunch of screencaps of Sansa's necklace missing a bead and "theorizing" that the necklace contained the poison.

Sigh what is actually wrong with people like this?

People on an internet forum I don't know might think that I'm smart for working something out?

Might just be really good at watching tv

figuring out R+L=J AFTER last season might be possible, but the Sansa necklace thing is a laugh.

I'm might be alone on this but I think that if the TV series existed without the books that hands down someone would have come up with the theory regarding Sansa's necklace. Joffrey is probably the most iconic TV villain of the last decade and he died mysteriously. There would be plenty of people putting forth theories and we live in a time where movie trailers are literally analyzed frame by frame. Someone would have noticed the missing gem on Sansa's necklace.

It's honestly not even on the same level as people figuring out that Huell lifted the ricin cigarette off of Jesse. I have no problem with people posting theories with evidence sourced from the episodes.

You're not alone.

For anyone who watched Lost during it original run, this seems obviously true.

Yeah your right, I guess I didn't think of the nerding out and watching the scene in slow motion 1000 times in a row.

any chance melissandre wont be the one resurrecting jon ?

Sure. Him warging into Ghost is one theory, there are others.

i just saw a youtube video title that says "why it wont be melissandre". but i havent watched it. any chance it gonna be davos? cause: davos never believed in the lord of light. maybe somehow he receives resurrection +10 and revives azhor snow?!

sandor is reviving jon HOW CAN YOU PEOPLE NOT SEE THIS

skudroc, thats probably the theory that Jon will be revived when they burn his body, cuz fire doesn't burn a dragon

well i forget my last thought: and that will turn davos into one of the biggest fans of r'llohr!

@ bremen: im not sure. i think the reviving will need some kind of human interaction/human reviving skills. just put on a fire and lay jon on it and somehow he wakes up? thats not enough.

RE: Jon's destiny
The title of the first ep is

That kinda seals it for me.

Having to wait months to finally find out what was inside the hatch was probablly the best and worst time of TV I had in my life.

Just finished The Lies of Locke Lamora. Really liked it, only flaw was being too descriptive and bit too many flashbacks. 4.5/5, will read the 2nd one too.

I'm planning on starting that series next.

I finished The Kingkiller Chronicles last week and thought they were great, shame the writer is being such a ****ing GRRM about the third book.

I've just started the third book in The First Law series and it's decent. They're really simply written compared to the KingKiller series but Rothfuss seems to be a bit of a genius with words.

Say one thing about Joe Abercrombie though, say he likes to use the word "frown"

We got an extended version of that final scene with Davos

http://teamcoco.com/video/liam-cunni...thrones-secret