Quote:
Originally Posted by JiggsCasey
lol... 11-5 then? still a playoff team? ... don't dance around it, own it.
I thought the team could go 10-6 based on a good early start, and as I stated, key catalysts would be improvement of Tannehill, and dominance of Suh which has not been the case. I also expressed serious skepticism of the defense in general, but thought that Suh would have the power to make ordinary players look good, which also has not happened. I also expressed in the offseason, in this thread, that I thought they'd finish 8-8 (April) and serious skepticism about the defense (last January):
Quote:
My 2 cents on Coyle is, I don't know how much blame he has in the defense's downfall. I attribute the defensive downfall to the following:
1. Players are getting old. (Starks, Wake, Grimes?, Finnegan)
2. This team has had to dedicate the majority of draft resources to offense lately. (Last years draft: OT, WR, OT first 3 picks.)
3. Wheeler and Ellerbe were horrible signings and horrible players.
4. Allowed some solid players to leave. (Soliai, Langford, Davis, Smith, Dansby, Burnett)
Talent retention on this team is non existent.
Is Coyle a part of the problem? Maybe. But this defense has a lot wrong with it beyond Kevin Coyle. We can play the coaching carousel game until we're blue in the face but this is not going to get fixed until we get and KEEP better players.
I expected this to be a more physical team than it is. With Albert LT, Pouncey C, and James RT, there is a skeleton of a respectable offensive line there. But as per usual, they have been hampered by injuries, inconsistency and Tannehlll standing in the pocket like a statue waiting to get nailed.
Have I been wrong? Yep. As anyone who chats about sports and makes casual predictions for the fun of it will be. I have also been right.
On the other hand, it's definitely clear you cannot admit when you're wrong and that you are a complete ******* for taking predictions I made partly for conversation sake in this pretty sparse thread and using them against me as some sort of bargaining chip to prove that your thoughts are superior to mine. Yet you A) didn't raise any concerns with the predictions until you had the results and B) never made any predictions yourself, and C) never admit when you are wrong, D) disappear when you are wrong