Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK

10-30-2010 , 10:09 PM
Yea, it looks like it.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
10-30-2010 , 10:25 PM
Yeah Fox is definitely back, Jets fans were going to start killing executives.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
10-31-2010 , 02:07 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rtaylor86
Anyone know a good free stream site for the game?
atdhe.net
i also heard a caller on the mike francesa show mention ?frontrow.net? or something like that.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
10-31-2010 , 04:14 PM
some pretty bad calls by the refs, but im putting this loss on the receivers. holmes and cotchery especially had some key drops. actually i dont think braylon dropped any haha
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
10-31-2010 , 04:21 PM
really disapointed in the jets this week, ugh, this was my lock of the week.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
10-31-2010 , 04:53 PM
real disapointing, anytime a defense only allows 9 points (in reality 6) a team shouldnt lose. cotch had so many drops. defense played great though, scott played his best game as a jet today IMO and harris once again beasted it up.

now lets just hope for a vikings win
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
10-31-2010 , 04:56 PM
Hey Jericho, thanks for the CLINIC in killing drives that you put on today
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
10-31-2010 , 05:50 PM
I was at a party so I wasn't really watching all that hard and couldn't hear the volume on the TV - but could someone explain to me the interceptions today? I thought the first one was a simultaneous possession and the second one did not even look close to me, it looked like Keller caught the ball fell to the ground, was down by contact and Woodson just took it out of his lap? I was really confused why that was called an interception? Again, unless I missed something because I could not really hear the announcers but it seemed fairly obvious it was a catch and reception no?
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
10-31-2010 , 05:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shipontilt
I was at a party so I wasn't really watching all that hard and couldn't hear the volume on the TV - but could someone explain to me the interceptions today? I thought the first one was a simultaneous possession and the second one did not even look close to me, it looked like Keller caught the ball fell to the ground, was down by contact and Woodson just took it out of his lap? I was really confused why that was called an interception? Again, unless I missed something because I could not really hear the announcers but it seemed fairly obvious it was a catch and reception no?
first one was an int imo, but im a packers fan.

2nd one was lol, but they ruled it packers and rex was out of red flags.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
10-31-2010 , 05:53 PM
Yeah, makes you wonder what the refs are watching sometimes when they miss stuff like that. It really goes to show you they just blatantly guess in certain spots.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
10-31-2010 , 06:03 PM
From ESPN....

The Jets had a nice drive end in the fourth quarter when Dustin Keller caught a pass from Sanchez, rolled and then had the ball grabbed out of his hands by Charles Woodson.

The Packers cornerback jogged into the end zone while several players on both teams looked around bewildered. Woodson was later ruled down by contact at the Packers 43.

Replays showed it appeared Keller was down and it should not have been an interception, but New York was out of challenges after using them both in the first half.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
10-31-2010 , 06:13 PM
rex used his flags poorly imo.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
10-31-2010 , 10:22 PM
sanchez has made his share of bad throws this season that could have easily been ints, funny how he gets 2 here on flukes

cotchery is having a pretty bad season. in 08 and 09, he had only 4 drops combined. disappointing but hope he can pick it up soon
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
11-01-2010 , 12:10 PM
No talk of the stupidity of fake punting on 4th and 18 from your own 20? I guess this moronocity is overshadowed by Jets offensive fail but jesus. Fake punts are so rare they typically get a lot of yd but EIGHTEEN? That's on the high side to expect. I mean the play practically worked to perfection and they STILL didn't get them all. WTF rex???
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
11-01-2010 , 12:13 PM
the fake punt is awful. you are only successful a small amount of time, and even then you have a first down on your own 40. the rest of the time you are handing the other team between 3-7 points
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
11-01-2010 , 12:16 PM
Ryan said the fake punt was Weatherford's decision.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
11-01-2010 , 12:16 PM
rex didn't call the fake punt. rex trusts weatherford to make a judgement call if he can get the yards or not, and for some reason weatherford thought he could get all 18. he came damn close, too
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
11-01-2010 , 12:17 PM
i mean its pretty bad to let your punter decide that, but it shows the trust rex has in his team. if it worked that would of been ignored.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
11-01-2010 , 01:37 PM
Meh, the fake punt wasn't really a big play in the grand scheme of things. That's why it hasn't been discussed much.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
11-01-2010 , 01:43 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by shipontilt
Meh, the fake punt wasn't really a big play in the grand scheme of things. That's why it hasn't been discussed much.
it directly led to the only 3 points scored in the entire first half, which was half of the total points scored in the first 59 minutes.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
11-01-2010 , 02:43 PM
Wow, 3 whole points? How about Santonio Holmes dropping a touchdown pass with no defenders around him? How about the Jets driving in Green Bay territory in the 4th quarter and then Woodson "intercepts" Sanchez.
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
11-01-2010 , 03:20 PM
3 whole points in a game where THOSE ARE THE ONLY POINTS is pretty big, yes
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
11-01-2010 , 06:17 PM
the fake punt was obviously very stupid
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
11-01-2010 , 06:24 PM
u guys gonna lose to the lions
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote
11-01-2010 , 08:13 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by GREEAR10
u guys gonna lose to the lions
lols
J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS: LETS GO EAT A GOD DAMN SNACK Quote

      
m