Quote:
Originally Posted by ZeroKool
2003 British Open if they'd had the millionaire maker, I bet someone would have won without the winner. Ben Curtis would have been < 0.5% owned, and since he only shot -1 it's not like he would have had a ton of points to separate himself from the field. So someone with a team made up of 6 guys in the top 10 could have taken it down without Curtis. I'd work out the points but I'm busy putting together my losing PGA teams for next week.
idk, even .1% on 150k entrants is 150 lineups. If you have a guy like Ben Curtis in your lineup then you probably have either Tiger or Vijay or both and they finished t4 and t2. This would basically mean you get 4 other guys in the top 25 and you're good.
The rest of the top 10 was guys who would have been a mix of premium guys you'd struggle to fit with Tiger and Vijay (DL3, Sergio, Goosen), ok players (Thomas Bjorn, Kenny Perry, Freddy Jacobson, and old Faldo), and complete randos who would be no more heavily owned than Curtis (Gary Evans-2 top 30s in majors ever, Brian Davis-2nd major cut he ever made and other was t68, Hennie Otto-first major he played, Phillip Price-2 career top 50s in majors)