I didn't say whether I wanted high exposure or not, just that on a full slate you want more disparity in your lineups than a stack. Also, any team can score 10+ runs(sometimes even 20
), but some teams are full of 1% owned players while others are full of 20+%. Maybe I'm wrong but it seems like on a 15 game schedule the average winning score is higher than on a 6 or even 10 game slate, which makes me think stacks are less favorable.
And yeah as I said earlier in the part of the post you chose not to quote, if you stack a popular team in a big GPP where one of your expensive bats puts up a dud you're not going to have any win equity, imo
Last edited by THAY3R; 08-30-2015 at 05:11 PM.