Sorry in advance if this question has been asked before but I couldn't find an answer. I realize it takes a very large sample for GPP win rates and ROI to stabilize but has anyone see or have an estimated guess at what sustainable win rates are for GPPs? Thank you.
fantasdy labs costs like 2k/day now since its out of beta
i'm on salazar tho so they probably aren't and have some weird stat that like when a pitchers salary was divisible by 27 he's produced 1.4 more points than expected
i saw they had an article on using vegas lines to determine the flow of the nfl game. wanted to laugh at it but premium only unfortunately
i'm on salazar tho so they probably aren't and have some weird stat that like when a pitchers salary was divisible by 27 he's produced 1.4 more points than expected
Actually if i go carpenter instead of Frazier I probably win all the money tonight but who leaves 1k+ on the table??
I have been told that leaving 500 to 800 on the table is a good tournament strategy cause it will make your lineup more different then the average one. I don't play enough tournaments to know. Does anyone know if there's any truth in this?
I actually do it quite often if I play tournaments. I feel like it's a good strategy but have no proof to back it up.
Didn't do it today since I only played my one lineup in everything.
But yeah when I multi enter the slam or whatever I'll leave a decent chuck on the table for differentiation purposes. I'm sure there are better tournament strategies though but I've tried to primarily be a cash player.
agree with this. people get to concerned with low owned guys instead of just taking the best play. now if i think two guys rate out very similar i'll take the lower owned one. just leaving large amounts out there in a gpp however when i see clear upgrades just is awful to me. only time i think i've done this was the few times i had 20 or 30 tickets to a tourney and mostly stacking but wanting to get certain plays with top stacks
