Now I do realize there are a few pros on ps that solely reply om SNE benefits to fund their rolls on a yearly basis.

Now from what I understand these are usually mega multitabling short stack players, Turbo SNGs etc.

So theoretically if you can beat a pool of players you'd want to do it as quickly as possiblewith as little rake paid.

Now if you are truly beating a game, why is it more beneficial to do it slowly to maximize rake back?

If your win rate is 5BB/100 and your rake back strategy yields an identical WR why choose the latter.


Of course my only solution at the moment seems like short stack strategy is the least mastered at the moment therefore seems like an easy and autopilot job.

However if we really think about the poker economy, this is causing us to dilute the funds within the players and dumping more to the sites.

Anywayss, apart from my point in the last line - I'm confused why would someone truly want to pay that much rake to only get a portion back later apart from being exploitive with a short stack game strategy.