Open Side Menu Go to the Top
Register
Big Game, Little Game... Big Game, Little Game...

11-29-2013 , 04:16 PM
As I understand it game size is used as a measure of game complexity.

Which widespread forms of poker are the "largest". Which are the "smallest"? How far away are we from solving the smallest game? What about the largest?

Can these questions be answered? Do they make sense?
Big Game, Little Game... Quote
11-29-2013 , 05:21 PM
Your questions don't make sense.

As I see it, Big Game is highest available stakes at a certain location. If a casino spreads only 1/2 and 2/5 No Limit Holdem than 2/5 NLHE would be considered Big Game.
Big Game, Little Game... Quote
11-29-2013 , 07:45 PM
Imo game size is determined by:

- Size of stack
- Number of streets, rounds of betting and bet size options
- Number of opponents
- Total number of hand combinations

As for answering your question op, sorry I have no idea.
Big Game, Little Game... Quote
11-29-2013 , 10:57 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Svizac
Your questions don't make sense.

As I see it, Big Game is highest available stakes at a certain location. If a casino spreads only 1/2 and 2/5 No Limit Holdem than 2/5 NLHE would be considered Big Game.
He means the size of the game tree, not the stakes
Big Game, Little Game... Quote
11-29-2013 , 11:50 PM
Then, 2-7 NL TD should be the most complicated
Big Game, Little Game... Quote

      
m