Quote:
Originally Posted by caseycjc
Are you basically saying making short stackers buy in to the next table they sit in on (after pushing and winning an all in) buy in for what they left the other table with? Sorry I was having trouble following your post......
Yes. You said it better than I did
This should have been done a long time ago. Poker sites make the mistake of copying live methods to prevent ratholing, but they don't work because of the changed dynamic of being able to play only one table live vs internet multitabling. The correct way for sites to attack ratholing is to say "you can't effectively take chips off the table by sitting at a new table". Playing live, there isn't a problem with this because people can't switch tables all the time, but on the internet, because table switching is standard, the sites have to treat ratholing like it applies to all tables instead of just specific ones.
This is an extremely easy fix, and would be great for the games. Every poker player on the planet hates ratholers, be they good regs or casual players. Ratholers are vampires, and the sites are kidding themselves if they think that they have taken the right preventative measures.
The normal approach has been to raise time limits or raise min buy ins, but those are wrong. Recreational players like to and should be allowed to buy in small, and time limits don't reflect the reality of how quickly tables turnover online. The correct thing for the sites to do is to treat taking chips off one table like it applies to all tables. There could be some leeway though that would allow non-ratholing shortstacker recreational players to do what they want with something like a 5-10 times allowed taking chips off any table limit per day, but this would kill professional ratholers
I think that if Merge did this they would see even more of a boost of players since basically every site has problems of shove or fold ratholers that frustrate everybody including the recreational players that keep the games running.