Quote:
Originally Posted by Go_Blue
How often are you guys focusing on what your opponent is trying to do versus what you're trying to do?
"Versus"? There's no dichotomy. Both are interconnected. What your opponent is trying to do often leads to what you want to do. What you are trying to do often leads to what your opponent should do. Etc. etc. etc.
You should keep track of what your opponent is trying to do on pretty much every move. It usually helps to ask "What does my opponent's last move do?" very early in your thought process.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Go_Blue
Or maybe a more clear question is: When do you decide it's time to be defensive versus offensive?
This question isn't the same at all -- the mappings of "offense -> what you're trying to do" and "defense -> what your opponent's trying to do" don't work. You're not going to be good at "offense" if you aren't paying attention to your opponent's resources. And strong defensive play requires an awareness of what you have going on (counterattacking resources, whatever).
Quote:
Originally Posted by Go_Blue
Is it mainly an instinctual "this could get dangerous" type of feeling when you look to be defensive?
I think you should rarely be "looking to be offensive" or "looking to be defensive". You should be looking to play the strongest moves / operations you can find, whatever they are.
Like, imagine a typical position that calls for a pawn storm. By playing it, you aren't "looking to be offensive"; you are looking to enact a positional operation that you recognize to be correct, which happens to be offensive. When you play Kc1-b1 while castled on opposite wings, you aren't "looking to be defensive"; you are playing the move you recognize to be correct and which happens to be of a defensive nature.
You get to a point in a contest of dueling pawn storms where your opponent threatens to win a bit of material, and you sac it (and it happens to be the best move) to continue with your attack. Were you really "looking to be offensive"? Okay, maybe. (This can be one of the rare instances where it might be helpful to think that way.) But more than that, you were playing in accordance with what you know the position calls for -- a valuation of tempi > inessential material -- which happens to be (very) offensively. If you didn't know that concept beforehand, if all you had was a determination to play offensively, would you sac the material? Maybe not. That clearly isn't what reliably leads to the correct moves -- it's calculation* and/or the knowledge of (and feel for) specific positions that does.
*I won't bother with a calculation-intensive example. It should be obvious anyway.
Last edited by Rei Ayanami; 02-19-2015 at 05:49 AM.